Key points from the "Key Points"
- The fail was not spending enough money and not in the right places (JFC - reminds me of the UMass athletics supporters who think spending the most on their coaches equates to more winning all on it's own)
- Biden did not set up Harris for success, they did not research how to help her
- Kamala was not a/the Border Czar and the administration did not fight or refute that narrative
- Team Biden did a poor job defining Trump
- Harris took too much and too many for granted (POC for example)
What a bunch of horse-schidt
MY VERSION:
The party completely failed the conversion from Biden to Harris. Anyone with a clear head could see she was not qualified at any point, never mind in this situation; where she had to compress running a 2 year campaign into 4 months.
Blaming Biden for Harris's failure is deceptive at best. Someone / anyone tell me what he could have done to make her a better candidate? The one major responsibility that was assigned to her was an abject failure (as Border Czar). It did not matter one flying F what it was "labeled" as, she failed.
The report fails to assert THE SINGLE reason they lost the election.... Harris was a bad candidate, the Dems made a snap, panic decision. They may have lost regardless, but IMO they stripped away the "choice". Pick a short field of 3 or 4 people; let them present to the Convention and let the delegates decide who runs against Trump. That accomplishes two things:
- It gives a better feel of "electing" the representative
- It spreads the R's resources to attack over more people instead of collectively all on Kamala by herself
It was a two month concentrated campaign regardless, at least give those delegates the option to pick their person. Installing that mush-mouth was just dumb.
