(11-14-2025 03:02 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(11-14-2025 02:52 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(11-14-2025 01:36 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Sweet, sunlight on any and all of this stuff is great. Doesn't help to get people to take this seriously though if you address everything that comes from emails to Wolfe as from "disgraced journalist" though. I know why they want to attempt to thread that needle, but either all things involving him can be viewed as potentially creditable or none of them can, can't only be creditable 1 direction.

My personal opinion on Wolfe is that you shouldn't automatically dismiss or take as a fact anything that comes from him, but that applies across the board not dependent on the subject.

Agree. Moreover, I have a feeling a major sticking point is that nobody is going to be credible in this whole debacle. It’s a complicated afffair involving dishonest people, professional grifters and con-men.

Absent video evidence showing sexual acts being performed, good luck convicting anyone.

I'm mostly going to be following the stuff that comes out on the money trail. For a while now I've believed the real reason both sides have been covering for him isn't about the girls but about him very likely being an intelligence asset. Already been a whole bunch of stuff that's dropped regarding him, former Israeli Prime Minister Barak, and other members of Israeli intelligence. The stuff with the girls and the big names will draw the most attention, but those are the threads I think actually get to where his money came from, why he got away with it so long, and why no one wanted any of this stuff to see the light of day for years.

Yep, he had to have been an asset. The fact intelligence agencies looked away at sex trafficking in exchange for intelligence is highly embarrassing for government agencies and others in office who were aware of it.

One could really go down the rabbit-hole here- I would not be surprised if a lot of these young girls and women were direct informants as well and potentially received intelligence training.

Alleges Hillary Had Sexual

Nastiest thread of the year award nominee

(11-14-2025 02:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  What laws were broken when she had this affair? Are they the same laws that cover no sex with children?

You are such a tiresome individual.

(11-14-2025 02:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-14-2025 02:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  What laws were broken when she had this affair? Are they the same laws that cover no sex with children?

Its hillary. I would think it falls under beastiality....

(11-14-2025 07:26 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(11-14-2025 02:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  What laws were broken when she had this affair? Are they the same laws that cover no sex with children?

You are such a tiresome individual.

Take a nap. The question still stands when you wake up…

(11-14-2025 03:02 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(11-14-2025 02:52 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(11-14-2025 01:36 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Sweet, sunlight on any and all of this stuff is great. Doesn't help to get people to take this seriously though if you address everything that comes from emails to Wolfe as from "disgraced journalist" though. I know why they want to attempt to thread that needle, but either all things involving him can be viewed as potentially creditable or none of them can, can't only be creditable 1 direction.

My personal opinion on Wolfe is that you shouldn't automatically dismiss or take as a fact anything that comes from him, but that applies across the board not dependent on the subject.

Agree. Moreover, I have a feeling a major sticking point is that nobody is going to be credible in this whole debacle. It’s a complicated afffair involving dishonest people, professional grifters and con-men.

Absent video evidence showing sexual acts being performed, good luck convicting anyone.

I'm mostly going to be following the stuff that comes out on the money trail. For a while now I've believed the real reason both sides have been covering for him isn't about the girls but about him very likely being an intelligence asset. Already been a whole bunch of stuff that's dropped regarding him, former Israeli Prime Minister Barak, and other members of Israeli intelligence. The stuff with the girls and the big names will draw the most attention, but those are the threads I think actually get to where his money came from, why he got away with it so long, and why no one wanted any of this stuff to see the light of day for years.

I suspect lots of people who give money to both parties and allies overseas will look bad when this comes out. Not necessarily politicians. And certainly not DJT.