Quote:Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

https://dailycaller.com/2025/11/01/opini...ve-bossie/

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump...9177726394

I mean he authorized illicit spying on half the Senate

(11-03-2025 06:33 AM)solohawks Wrote:  I mean he authorized illicit spying on half the Senate

And the president.

Wasn't Boasberg also the FISA judge who approved all the bogus Russia warrants?

(11-03-2025 10:43 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Wasn't Boasberg also the FISA judge who approved all the bogus Russia warrants?

Yes. Or at least most of them.

That alone should have already had him impeached and put on trial.

I support Boasberg’s impeachment and removal from the bench, but we all know there aren’t 67 votes for this in the Senate. But that said, I think the House should do it anyway.

(11-03-2025 10:50 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  I support Boasberg’s impeachment and removal from the bench, but we all know there aren’t 67 votes for this in the Senate. But that said, I think the House should do it anyway.

Yes. He needs to be exposed, discredited and have his embarrassing actions brought out in full view of the public.

And use that to file a complaint with the state bar association. (not that they will do anything).

The impeachment will cause any appeals court to look more closely at his rulings in the future.

(11-03-2025 01:52 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-03-2025 10:50 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  I support Boasberg’s impeachment and removal from the bench, but we all know there aren’t 67 votes for this in the Senate. But that said, I think the House should do it anyway.

Yes. He needs to be exposed, discredited and have his embarrassing actions brought out in full view of the public.

And use that to file a complaint with the state bar association. (not that they will do anything).

This. Also, what you said about the courts looking more closely at his rulings in the future if this happens? I also agree with you on that.

And there's a slim outside chance he will be embarrassed enough about having his actions exposed and his name in infamy for all history that he might resign.

(11-04-2025 01:06 PM)bullet Wrote:  And there's a slim outside chance he will be embarrassed enough about having his actions exposed and his name in infamy for all history that he might resign.

Only when there is a D. president to make the nomination of his replacement.

Truly a Zero percent chance Boasberg voluntarily steps down while Trump is President.

(11-03-2025 10:50 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  I support Boasberg’s impeachment and removal from the bench, but we all know there aren’t 67 votes for this in the Senate. But that said, I think the House should do it anyway.

Yep, this is an example of where the process needs to occur even if the outcome of aquittal is certain

Quote:I just filed Articles of Impeachment against radical activist Judge James Boasberg.

Judge Boasberg abused his power by weaponizing the judiciary against critics of the Biden Administration. As part of the Arctic Frost Investigation, Judge Boasberg signed off on frivolous nondisclosure orders to conceal the fact that sitting US Senators were being surveilled. Not only was this action egregiously improper; it was a gross violation of the separation of powers.

Judge Boasberg is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, is unfit for office, and should be impeached.

Word is he might also be charged by DoJ for criminal offenses for various deprivation of civil rights...and having terminal male pattern baldness.

Release the hounds!

(11-04-2025 02:28 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-03-2025 10:50 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  I support Boasberg’s impeachment and removal from the bench, but we all know there aren’t 67 votes for this in the Senate. But that said, I think the House should do it anyway.

Yep, this is an example of where the process needs to occur even if the outcome of aquittal is certain

yep ... I would do whatever they can to make his life an everlovin' miserable hell on earth...

This guy isn’t a Trump foe. He’s a crooked enemy of what’s right, just and lawful.

He’s the FISA guy too. He’s toast.

(11-04-2025 09:18 PM)450bench Wrote:  This guy isn’t a Trump foe. He’s a crooked enemy of what’s right, just and lawful.

He’s the FISA guy too. He’s toast.

They have to get 60 votes in the Senate to impeach him and actually remove him. I don't see that happening.

(11-04-2025 09:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 09:18 PM)450bench Wrote:  This guy isn’t a Trump foe. He’s a crooked enemy of what’s right, just and lawful.

He’s the FISA guy too. He’s toast.

They have to get 60 votes in the Senate to impeach him and actually remove him. I don't see that happening.

I don't either, to be honest.

(11-04-2025 09:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 09:18 PM)450bench Wrote:  This guy isn’t a Trump foe. He’s a crooked enemy of what’s right, just and lawful.

He’s the FISA guy too. He’s toast.

They have to get 60 votes in the Senate to impeach him and actually remove him. I don't see that happening.

I don’t disagree but just having a bright light shined on the guy a good thing.

True. I just don't see it making a difference.