(11-04-2025 03:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:36 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey look, a three-man love fest.

"But I'm not on the left!!!"

Sorry puddin, but not every conservative fell in line with your cult. Deal with it.

Who gives a flying crap?

I just think it's funny that he is so adamant about it, when he argues the left side of almost every issue, and you and Elvis are the main peeps who give him brownie points.

My real goal is to make one post on this board before I die that he doesn't feel compelled to respond to.

On, and Tom, thanks for proving my point, since you defended his posting in agreement with you.

Not being a fan of pardoning people who assaulted police officers is ‘left’?

Interesting test there, champ. That’s been the main flaw in your continued whine on the subject. That and you being too stupid to be able to name any specific issue, and concurrently too lazy to bother to check.

Kind of sums up 3Aville to a tee I’d say. Neat look there, bro.

(11-04-2025 05:36 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:36 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey look, a three-man love fest.

"But I'm not on the left!!!"

Sorry puddin, but not every conservative fell in line with your cult. Deal with it.

Who gives a flying crap?

I just think it's funny that he is so adamant about it, when he argues the left side of almost every issue, and you and Elvis are the main peeps who give him brownie points.

My real goal is to make one post on this board before I die that he doesn't feel compelled to respond to.

On, and Tom, thanks for proving my point, since you defended his posting in agreement with you.

Not being a fan of pardoning people who assaulted police officers is ‘left’?

Interesting test there, champ. That’s been the main flaw in your continued whine on the subject. That and you being too stupid to be able to name any specific issue, and concurrently too lazy to bother to check.

Kind of sums up 3Aville to a tee I’d say. Neat look there, bro.

Your English comprehension sucks. I never mentioned the thread subject at all. Right now, I wouldn't know what it was, without reading the title.

I already explained this 3 times to Ball Boy in one of these threads.

I don't need to prove a damn thing. People can decide for themselves.

As I said before, would you like to take a vote, Mr. Know-it-all?

(11-04-2025 07:15 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 05:36 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:36 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey look, a three-man love fest.

"But I'm not on the left!!!"

Sorry puddin, but not every conservative fell in line with your cult. Deal with it.

Who gives a flying crap?

I just think it's funny that he is so adamant about it, when he argues the left side of almost every issue, and you and Elvis are the main peeps who give him brownie points.

My real goal is to make one post on this board before I die that he doesn't feel compelled to respond to.

On, and Tom, thanks for proving my point, since you defended his posting in agreement with you.

Not being a fan of pardoning people who assaulted police officers is ‘left’?

Interesting test there, champ. That’s been the main flaw in your continued whine on the subject. That and you being too stupid to be able to name any specific issue, and concurrently too lazy to bother to check.

Kind of sums up 3Aville to a tee I’d say. Neat look there, bro.

Your English comprehension sucks. I never mentioned the thread subject at all. Right now, I wouldn't know what it was, without reading the title.

I already explained this 3 times to Ball Boy in one of these threads.

I don't need to prove a damn thing. People can decide for themselves.

As I said before, would you like to take a vote, Mr. Know-it-all?

Still looking for all these things I take the ‘left’ position on, champ.

All I still see is your flailing arms flapping up and down, with a bunch of generalized unsupported lip flapping.

Nothing to vote, just toss all these examples out. Facts, dude. Facts. Maybe that’s a hill too tough for you to comprehend. Should be easy — Since according to you “[I] argue[] the left side of *almost every issue*”.

But apparently the “almost every issue” isn’t enough for you to find backing. Lolz. Life sure seems tough there in 3Aville.

Pedo joe autopen had no clue. Worst pres in history

(11-04-2025 07:32 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Pedo joe autopen had no clue. Worst pres in history

Funny, it was your object of deification that just day before yesterday said he had no idea who he had pardoned. He should know his crypto business partners a bit better,

Make a thread with a poll, Clarence. "Do people think I'm left wing based on my posts in this Spin Room? Yes or no?" (But you won't because you're a chicken.) (Hey, at least I remembered you're fowl.) (Pun intended.)

(11-04-2025 11:00 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Make a thread with a poll, Clarence. "Do people think I'm left wing based on my posts in this Spin Room? Yes or no?" (But you won't because you're a chicken.) (Hey, at least I remembered you're fowl.) (Pun intended.)

Why should I rely on a bunch of dumbasses who simply use the term 'left' to signify anyone they dont agree with, lil boy?

Or for that matter, folks who cant seem to understand the term left, except as a thin ass equivalent to 'doesnt support trump'? Even your minor god Charlie knew what a leftist was, and could actually answer what the issues they supported were? All I see above is some thin semi-illiterate dude with a Charlie Kirk fetish saying that a philosophy or political stance is determined by a ...... get this..... poll..... and further get this...... a poll on bulletin board.

I dont think Ive seen anything more ill thought out in and vapid in scores of years. Good job there, Gemini. <slow clap>

So you are chicken. I knew it.

Cluck cluck, buddy boy.

(11-04-2025 11:49 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  So you are chicken. I knew it.

Cluck cluck, buddy boy.

I am glad you think a poll of a bunch of fktards would be an accurate assessment of a political philosophy, my friend.

Kind of true dumb*** way of 'proving it'. But you be you, bro.

Actually, its pretty laughable you even think it somewhat viable. But again, you be you, mi amigo.

Lolz. Kind of a bad dream of pimple faced dude doing an epeen episode during Call of Duty, combined with real true misunderstanding of an issue. Not a great combo there, friend.

"political philosophy"

Noted,

(11-04-2025 04:08 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-04-2025 03:36 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey look, a three-man love fest.

"But I'm not on the left!!!"

Sorry puddin, but not every conservative fell in line with your cult. Deal with it.

Who gives a flying crap?

I just think it's funny that he is so adamant about it, when he argues the left side of almost every issue, and you and Elvis are the main peeps who give him brownie points.

My real goal is to make one post on this board before I die that he doesn't feel compelled to respond to.

On, and Tom, thanks for proving my point, since you defended his posting in agreement with you.

You apparently do, or you wouldn't be trying so hard to make him out to be a leftie, when he's nothing of the sort.

Not to mention this idiotic rule around here where everyone has to be painted into a box and saddled with every negative thing you want to label that box with.

And you're off your rocker if you think he responds to every post you make. He's rarely here when compared to you. You have 3x the posts he does.

I meant on the subjects he chooses to engage in. Those posts. My bad for not making that clear.

And frankly, I don't give a damn where he lands politically. But it has been a long-standing habit of his, to the point that the late Owl#s felt compelled to defend him, that he seems to come down on the left side of the issues he chooses to engage in, yet he wants to deny that.

I simply find that entertaining, particularly since he has a habit of changing the subject, or ignoring points made by the other person, or emphasizing minor points in arguing with WHOM? On yeah, those of us in here on the RIGHT. Duhhhhh...

Not to mention, look who is in here defending him.

So....you're chiding him...for posting on a message board? Dude, seek help. That's the whole ******* point!

And if you don't want him taking you to task, either ignore him, or start making better arguments.

Nobody is chiding him for posting on a message board. Do you not comprehend simple English?

We are chiding him for claiming he's a libertarian with conservative leanings, when many of his comments tend to be sympathetic to the left, or highly critical of the right.

Make better arguments? I don't try to debate him about anything, b/c he's too dishonest, he ignores salient points made by others, and blows up things out of proportion to the subject at hand. I tried that and gave up long ago. I simply comment about his left-leaning posts.

For some reason, it seems to irritate him that we have the impression he is sympathetic to the left. I mean, look at who gives him a lot of his brownie points. Duh...

Basically he's Tom.

(11-06-2025 01:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Nobody is chiding him for posting on a message board. Do you not comprehend simple English?

We are chiding him for claiming he's a libertarian with conservative leanings, when many of his comments tend to be sympathetic to the left, or highly critical of the right.

Make better arguments? I don't try to debate him about anything, b/c he's too dishonest, he ignores salient points made by others, and blows up things out of proportion to the subject at hand. I tried that and gave up long ago. I simply comment about his left-leaning posts.

For some reason, it seems to irritate him that we have the impression he is sympathetic to the left. I mean, look at who gives him a lot of his brownie points. Duh...

You're just so lost.

(11-06-2025 04:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-06-2025 01:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Nobody is chiding him for posting on a message board. Do you not comprehend simple English?

We are chiding him for claiming he's a libertarian with conservative leanings, when many of his comments tend to be sympathetic to the left, or highly critical of the right.

Make better arguments? I don't try to debate him about anything, b/c he's too dishonest, he ignores salient points made by others, and blows up things out of proportion to the subject at hand. I tried that and gave up long ago. I simply comment about his left-leaning posts.

For some reason, it seems to irritate him that we have the impression he is sympathetic to the left. I mean, look at who gives him a lot of his brownie points. Duh...

You're just so lost.

Coming from you, that's a compliment.

(11-06-2025 01:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  We are chiding him for claiming he's a libertarian with conservative leanings, when ALL of his comments are completely sympathetic to the left, or highly critical of the right.

Fixed your post.

(11-06-2025 04:54 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-06-2025 01:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  We are chiding him for claiming he's a libertarian with conservative leanings, when ALL of his comments are completely sympathetic to the left, or highly critical of the right.

Fixed your post.

Well, I want to give him the benefit of the doubt, just in case I missed something. What I don't understand is why he denies something that is so obvious.

(11-06-2025 05:00 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-06-2025 04:54 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-06-2025 01:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  We are chiding him for claiming he's a libertarian with conservative leanings, when ALL of his comments are completely sympathetic to the left, or highly critical of the right.

Fixed your post.

Well, I want to give him the benefit of the doubt, just in case I missed something. What I don't understand is why he denies something that is so obvious.

100% correct. He, Tom, and a couple others would earn some respect if they just came out and said they were lefty libs and owned it. Just be honest.

But, I guess that's too much to ask.

686e3

(11-06-2025 05:17 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-06-2025 05:00 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-06-2025 04:54 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(11-06-2025 01:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  We are chiding him for claiming he's a libertarian with conservative leanings, when ALL of his comments are completely sympathetic to the left, or highly critical of the right.

Fixed your post.

Well, I want to give him the benefit of the doubt, just in case I missed something. What I don't understand is why he denies something that is so obvious.

100% correct. He, Tom, and a couple others would earn some respect if they just came out and said they were lefty libs and owned it. Just be honest.

But, I guess that's too much to ask.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-1019727-post-2...id20398900

Quote:tang wrote:
Actually I would readily admit actual leftist policies. Hard to disagree with them.

I will tell you, that within the libertarian items, there are some that actually could be denoted as somewhat leftist. Albeit based on the Friedman and Hayeks work.

In terms of economics that define leftism -- not anywhere near that. Nor anywhere in the ideas of central government.

=====

stink responded:
see how easy that was ... that's the tanq I remember...

@hadToCrop

Yeah, but I'm not talking about libertarian policies that lean left. I'm talking about actual words that Tanq types here that take the leftist POV. They're not a secret, and they're not hidden.

I just never made a note of them, and I'm not spending the time to dig them out. So that's why I started the current count. Up to 8, lol.