bill dazzle
Craft beer and urban living enthusiast

Posts: 18,581
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 2032
I Root For: Vanderbilt
Location: Nashville
|
RE: What do you think UConn's Big East future will hold RE: Conference relignment
(10-01-2025 06:48 PM)Nameless Wrote: (10-01-2025 03:56 PM)bill dazzle Wrote: (10-01-2025 10:40 AM)Nameless Wrote: (08-09-2025 03:59 PM)bill dazzle Wrote: (08-08-2025 11:06 AM)Nameless Wrote: The rumor I've heard is Duke will get an invite to the SEC with UNC. It makes sense to me; Duke is elite academically, and the SEC wants UNC. They have already solidified their status as the best football league, and after last year are clearly in the conversation for best basketball league. Grabbing Duke and UNC will help solidify their status as the best league in both of the top revenue sports.
Once this happens I don't think they stay at 18, they go to at least 20. If they nab 2 more teams from the ACC, I think Virginia has to be one of them. UVA will be a really hot commodity if the ACC breaks up, they have it all; market, academics, the ability to compete in revenue sports, etc.
From what I've heard, the SEC doesn't even really want Clemson or FSU. They make take both for rivalry games if the ACC is blowing up, but I think they only do so if there is strong interest from the B1G as a way of blocking them from gaining a foothold in their territory. In this scenario they likely go to 24, and most of the ACC is picked off as the B1G follows suit.
All of the teams listed above are coveted in realignment circles, at least to an extent. So is Miami. Probably Virginia Tech to a lesser extent as well. Even Pitt, Louisville and Syracuse probably have some value to the Big XII. If th league has departures it will likely completely blow up the way th PAC did.
I'm terrible at predicting things, Nameless. But I could see the SEC adding UNC, Duke, Clemson and Florida State to get to 20 and the Big Ten adding Miami, Virginia, Kansas, Colorado, Stanford and Arizona State to go to 24.
Assuming the ACC and Big 12 don't merge at that point, that could open the door for UConn to join either league.
So if UConn heads to the ACC, this could be the lineup:
UConn
Boston College
Syracuse
Pittsburgh
Virginia Tech
North Carolina State
Wake Forest
Louisville
Georgia Tech
Notre Dame
California
SMU
That's 12 members. And I could see the additions of Tulane, USF and Oregon State (maybe even Memphis in this scenario).
That would be a quality all-sports league for UConn.
Of course if the Big 12 loses Kansas, Colorado and Arizona State (in this hypothetical), replacements could be Oregon State, San Diego State and Memphis.
Either way, UConn should land a seat at the "big boy table."
Sorry Bill, guess I never saw this post!
It would indeed be a quality all sports league. I think Memphis would definitely be added to it as well, and honestly if UConn were to join an ACC that looked like this I would hope and pray they were. Outside of Louisville I'm not sure which of those schools is set up for success in hoops. Memphis would be a nice 3rd team to round out the top of the league. With Cuse, Pitt, NC State etc being a nice second tier I think the league would get 3-5 bids most years.
I think the current Big East is a much better basketball league, though.
I respectfully disagree with the bolded part, N-Less.
So here is my hypothetical league (not that I think this will be the composition of any future ACC — but I'm using for the sake of argument):
Boston College
Syracuse
Pittsburgh
Virginia Tech
North Carolina State
Wake Forest
Louisville
Georgia Tech
Notre Dame
California
SMU
Oregon State
Tulane
USF
Memphis
In my opinion (which is worth nothing) that is as good a group of basketball programs as the group in the current Big East. And if not as good, it is only modestly inferior to the BE.
Even if that hypothetical ACC is perceived as notably worse than the BE in hoops, UConn would almost certainly join (assuming the finances crunch), for football and other reasons.
It's going to be very interesting to see how this plays out. We all agree that the ACC is going to lose some members. We just don't know how many. Nor do we know if the leftover ACC members will align with the Big 12.
I still feel there is a chance the future ACC (after being raided) could actually add some Big East members (ala a Notre Dame arrangement). Similarly, the Big East could add some leftover ACC members (with their football programs to go indy, ala UConn).
So many uncertainties. Unless a school is a P2 league member, all other schools and their fans (including all the Big East members and their fans) have reason to be a bit apprehensive.
In my opinion the most likely scenario in terms of ACC realignment, without naming specific schools is:
-SEC picks off the 4 properties it sees as the most ideal fits.
-B1G grabs 2 more remaining members. Both leagues are now at 20
-The XII, wanting to solidify themselves as the 3rd best conference takes the 4 programs it feels are best fits from the ACC to get to 20 as well.
-The ACC, down to 6 schools, adds UConn, Memphis, Tulane, USF and at least 2 teams from the reformed Pac to get to 12, but possibly as high as 16 teams.
Now, if I were to add teams to that scenario:
-SEC adds UNC, FSU, Duke and Kansas (I think JR is spot on over on the CRA board and the SEC wants to cement itself as the best football and basketball league, hence the Duke and Kansas adds)
-B1G adds Virginia and Miami (you can possibly substitute one for Clemson)
-XII adds Pitt, Cuse, Louisville and Clemson (or whoever didn't join the B1G if you swapped Clemson for Virginia or Miami)
So the 8 leftovers, in my eyes, are likely to be
BC
SMU
Cal
Stanford
Georgia Tech
NC State
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
I'm just not sure any of those programs will see sustained success in a weakened version of the ACC. Some are struggling as is. The Big East has programs completely dedicated to hoops, so even when teams struggle I'm more confident in their ability to regain their footing. I do think the teams you have listed in your scenario is a better cohort, so maybe "much better" was a poor choice of words. But I do think the Big East would be a more formidable basketball league most years
Let's say (and using your hypothetical), the ACC is left with these eight after being raided:
BC
SMU
Cal
Stanford
Georgia Tech
NC State
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
And let's suppose the league, wanting to go to 14 (and seeking to create a "Western wing" for travel purposes), invites these six:
Oregon State
Washington State
San Diego State
Tulane
Memphis
USF
That 14-member league would not be as good as the Big East in men's hoops. I'm with you. Of course, my hypothetical ACC (and that I previously posted) included Syracuse, Louisville, Pitt and Notre Dame (which obviously changes the dynamic for basketball).
Regardless, UConn is likely going to have an opportunity to improve its football situation at some point.
(This post was last modified: 10-02-2025 01:29 PM by bill dazzle.)
|
|