Muh due process

Probably will be rescheduled later

Sent from my Pixel 9 using Tapatalk

No one’s above the law…

sURe PaL.

(06-19-2025 10:18 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Probably will be rescheduled later

Sent from my Pixel 9 using Tapatalk

But why did they remove it in the first place? Did they do that for anybody else? Never mind, I bet I know the answer.

(06-20-2025 02:48 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-19-2025 10:18 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Probably will be rescheduled later

Sent from my Pixel 9 using Tapatalk

But why did they remove it in the first place? Did they do that for anybody else? Never mind, I bet I know the answer.

Reschedules happen all the time. Presiding judges have fairly fluid dockets.

Second, the defendant has a motion to dismiss in front of the presiding judge. Normally not an issue in docket terms, but due to the Supreme Court in a recent ruling, one that has to be decided *before* any trial. That motion is appealable, and I am quite sure that the losing party in that motion to dismiss will appeal it.

A reschedule to another time, or a removal from the list altogether?

And I would be curious to see how many others on that docket were "rescheduled" or whatever.

Laws are for thee, but not for me.

2 tier criminal just system.

(06-20-2025 06:57 AM)TripleA Wrote:  A reschedule to another time, or a removal from the list altogether?

And I would be curious to see how many others on that docket were "rescheduled" or whatever.

It's unique, for sure. Goes to the issue that officials is immunity has to be decided before anything else. See US v Trump for a example.

Available for any government official to have that immunity decided first before anything else.

The charge is still there, not removed. The trial date was removed from the trial docket. The case overall remains on the court docket.

(06-20-2025 11:50 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-20-2025 06:57 AM)TripleA Wrote:  A reschedule to another time, or a removal from the list altogether?

And I would be curious to see how many others on that docket were "rescheduled" or whatever.

It's unique, for sure. Goes to the issue that officials is immunity has to be decided before anything else. See US v Trump for a example.

Available for any government official to have that immunity decided first before anything else.

The charge is still there, not removed. The trial date was removed from the trial docket. The case overall remains on the court docket.

Thanks. Look, we had a real adult exchange! lol

(06-20-2025 12:18 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-20-2025 11:50 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  It's unique, for sure. Goes to the issue that officials is immunity has to be decided before anything else. See US v Trump for a example.

Available for any government official to have that immunity decided first before anything else.

The charge is still there, not removed. The trial date was removed from the trial docket. The case overall remains on the court docket.

Thanks. Look, we had a real adult exchange! lol

THE SKY IS FALLING!