(04-13-2023 04:09 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(04-13-2023 03:50 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-13-2023 03:41 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(04-13-2023 03:28 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-13-2023 03:09 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  As I’ve noted before, just as Trump would respond.
I think there is some jealousy aggregated by anonymity at play here.

If Ginny would respond with only facts he would be more ‘likable’. His propensity to respond in a nuclear fashion is off putting for someone so desperate to be taken seriously. But, whatever….

Maybe you might try a tad harder for the facts. That is what I start out with. Interesting that you gloss over them with the above.

I respond to ad hom attack comments in a similar fashion.

The facts I put down end up with the '**** for brains'-types going beserk in a Beavis and Butthead fashion.

You and I had a recent back and forth that was ad hom free, and fact rich. If people around here dont go howler monkey on me, I do not with them. Easy concept.

In this one, one poster decided to state a disagreement with what an 'arrest' was. I laid down facts on what an arrest is and the tests that it is determined. The idiot decided not to address those facts, but decided to go down an ad hom path. The record here is starkly clear. In fact I let a few of those whiny ad homs pass. And still presented that poster with mainly factual stuff.

Then the usual idiots joined in on the howler monkey crapola that seems to be there main method of dealing with facts they dont like.

While one can take from your comments above you wishing to join them, Id suggest you would be off base. But feel free to join the howler monkeys if you feel that urge.

"If people around here dont go howler monkey on me, I do not with them. Easy concept."

You sure about that Boss?

I like hopw

Maybe not 100% all the time --- but for the vast, vast majority of time, absolutely.

As a pretty good general rule -- yes. If people dont go howler monkey on me I dont on them.

I mean, you and I go cross tiered more often than not -- yet here I am not even hinting at that past (except in this last sentence, and in a very bland manner). Amazing that, eh?

"Maybe not 100% all the time"

That's a good answer,