(01-16-2023 05:42 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(01-16-2023 05:06 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-16-2023 04:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Or the specific crime in the Civil Rights act that makes selective prosecution *based on race* the same as simply whether or not to charge Trump?

But it's not just whether or not to charge Trump. It's whether to charge Trump and NOT charge Hillary (or Biden)

That was included in my full response that you clipped from. Your comparison to white v. black discriminations --- a fundamental Constitutional prohibition --- issue is inapt.

For the reasons in the full response.

Quote: for offenses that are considerably worse by any objective standard.

So you think that 3 total documents, on a server is "considerably worse by any objective standard" to over 100 *documents*, of several thousand pages, some at SCIF level label, locked behind a Yale padlock in the basement of a hotel, the hotel accessed by hundreds of people is "considerably worse".

Not just 'worse', but 'considerably worse', and 'considerably worse' by *any* objective standard.

Sorry, I cant buy into that.

We are talking about *just* the documents marked classified on an apples to apples basis.

Clinton was further found to have 113 documents containing sensitive or classified information.

We know there are 14 *thousand* additional government documents in Trump winter nut trove. How many do think might have equivalent information in them?

Even at 5%, you are talking 700 documents at issue.

Again --- no, I cant buy into the 'worseness' calculus you set out.