(09-24-2022 12:14 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 09:40 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-24-2022 06:14 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(09-23-2022 08:21 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-23-2022 07:30 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  You sure sound like one. DO you even listen to yourself? Do you wonder why even the loons here think you're one of them?

Last time I looked, it was issues that defined a party. Stuff like 2A, taxation, energy independence, judicial restraint, the concept of textualism in the role of aw and constitutional interpretation, strong law and order, strong defense.

I guess Ill leave it to the feebleminded to define party or politics on the idea of venerating one man.

Next time you give lecture like above, Id urge you to stop and think about what I just put down. Then, crawl out of your hole and determine what my stances are on those.

Or jut be a lazy ass and a paradigm of obtuseness and generate a kneejerk whine like you just did.

In all honesty, I dont agree with RWT on hardly any substantive issues in the above. But leave it to you pinheads to squeal otherwise when it suits your myopia and urge to lay that down with zero basis other than you being peeved. Good grief.

This is a cop out, and you know it tanq. What you are is an authoritarian apologist. A toady of the state. A member of the flock of sheep in Orwell’s “Animal Farm”.

And right there is the reason I give zero weight to your comments. I dont jump onto the supposition taxi as fast as you. That is, give me facts, Your facts simply fit the normal process of warrants under the law -- no matter how loud you scream and cry bout them. Sorry about that lil ol issue......

Corrupt magistrate --- no facts. The facts that are given are half-done. Incomplete.

Evil non-disclosure of an affidavit -- you tend to (not tend to, but abjectly) ignore that the affidavits are never disclosed until much later in the process.

The only distinguishing thing you ever point to is the identity of the person being searched. Got it --- you want special rule of law for just one person. Do you know how stupid that sounds?

Fact: The Biden/Obama administration has been publicly uncovered for weaponizing gov’t enforcement against political enemies - - examples: Lois Lerner IRS corruption; Samantha Powers unmasking; Peter Strzok 302 manipulation; false affidavits for the Carter Page FISA warrant.

Yay.... another rehash of the tired list of 'excuses'. In *this* matter, the warrants were done under the law, and in *this* matter they ostensibly found *exactly* what was being searched for. But please regale us all on the excuses and 'whadabouts'.

Quote:Fact: The Garland D.o.J. utilized the D.C. special investigations division to run the Mar-a-Lago raid instead of the local office, deviating from standard operating procedure.

As you so aptly noted and clamor incessantly -- this is a unique situation in a sense. It is the investigation and accompanying search of a former President. It also 'deviated' where Garland himself gave the go ahead. Not many street punk warrants get that treatment. Whoa -- hold the horses and stop the presses ----- the LOCAL office wasnt utilized to search the former President. That is a BOMBSHELL Adopted.... pure conspiracy DYNAMITE!!!

Quote:Fact: The complicit “judge” has made public comments adverse to the very target for which he issued the warrant, based upon an affidavit that he and he alone has seen in full text.

At least you arent bleating the 'recusal' pile of garbage that has been drifting around, and which was used incessantly by you previously. Making a comment on the former President is now grounds for a conspiracy? Seriously?

On the affidavit..... BFD. Tell me a single other affidavit in search that isnt held confidential at the search time -- let alone prior to indictment. Short answer --- it doesnt happen. But now it is grounds for DEEP CONSPIRACY. Got it.

Quote:Fact: The Garland gestapo offered no comment for several days to explain the justification for this shocking (yes, unprecedented) raid on the residence of a former president, and when finally forced to say something have had an evolving set of explanations.

Stop the presses -- Graland DIDNT comment. Smoking gun there.

Quote:It seems to me that as between the two of us, you are the one lacking any facts to support your arguments.

There are plenty of facts -- but you ostensibly choose to stick you head in the sand and grab at thin vines for your breathless exhortation of Gestapo and such. And pretty much piss on normal legal mechanisms in the process.

Quote:You have nothing more to offer than the ad hominems that you accuse others of directing at you

Im not the one that started the morning with the snivelly comment of 'toady' and such. Funny that. Amazing lack of self-awareness there.

Quote:and the unsupported conclusion that this was done according to standard procedure, when it clearly was not.

And Im not the one that whines when the Rules of Procedure are brought up. Good grief.

Quote:I stand by my prior statement, tanq., you are an authoritarian apologist and a toady for the state. That is much worse than the charge you took such offense at - - being a Democrat.

Great, if you want to go down the the 'apologist' and 'toady' low road, dont act like such a whiny snot when you get that style directed back at you (whicch I had not previously). Again, an amazing lack of self-awareness in that comment there. I didnt make a direct comment to you about that previously, because I chose not to. Now that you continue your snivelly ad homish whine, I have zero problem returning the exact same tone and respect to you. Bummer.

Great -- you think this is an act of an American Gestapo. I dont. I have previously chosen not to berate you on that based on my opinion. And you have sone the same.

Now, you choose otherwise. That is followed by your whiny complaint about that tone that you started Absolutely rich.

Quote: stand by my prior statement, tanq., you are an authoritarian apologist and a toady for the state.

Ill stand by my statement that you slurp up some thin gruel and call it a gourmet meal full of proof positive.