(09-23-2022 11:05 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(09-23-2022 10:26 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  If it would have turned up 0 classified documents, sure. But, they found 100 of them.

Did they or didn't they? We know that they have claimed to have found the 100 or so. But coming from an agency more known for partisanship than honesty--at least in recent years--how believable are their claims?

The couple of people on here that are constantly spouting off about the classified documents have most likely never handled or laid eyes on any, much less had training on what to do with classified information. I'm certain that they have exactly zero (as in zilch, nada, goose-egg, etc.) first-hand knowledge about either the classification level or the data within these documents - if they are even real to begin with. And, if they are real documents, they have no first-hand knowledge of whether or not the documents are still classified. As you stated, these higher ups involved here have already shown that they are willing to be dishonest in their attacks against Trump and Conservatives.

Did the FISA judge know that the FBI was lying to him when he approved the FISA warrant? No, he took their word on it and acted accordingly only to find out years later that it was an intentionally fabricated lie. It's the same principal that we are seeing play out here among a couple of posters that act as if this is all beyond questioning. I've got to hear a lot more confirmation of this from more reputable sources before I go out on that limb and accept them as "facts". I doubt that we will get to that point anytime soon.

If Jim Jones had survived and opened up another camp in Guyana after the disastrous ending of the first one, would YOU drink the Kool-Aid he was serving there? A blind follower would. That was a rhetorical question Owl. I already know what you would do.