(09-12-2022 11:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 11:47 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 11:42 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 11:41 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Well that is quite the turn from your original obstinate draw the line in the sand statements above that 'there is zero issue here'.

Seems to me there is enough heat here for Robb to skedaddle to the sidelines and get her own attorney. I wonder why that would be.

Because people with actual power share your excitement and penchant for creating a story better than Walt Disney.

Disney story? C'mon dude. You really doubt that trump had classified government documents in his home that doubles as a hotel? You actually believe the government would be stupid enough to create this whole charade and plant dozens of boxes somehow, especially when trump was watching the search from Manhattan on CCTV?

That's not the question though. The question I am engaging on is the one around the lawyer.

The facts are clear that he did have **** at his house.

Okay...thanks. But time will tell. I think I heard reports that the government is going to talk to her. I would imagine a good attorney will tell her to flip on trump. We'll see.

Flipping on him is a good way for her to lose her license.

I go back to what I said originally. If she called her client and asked, "y'all got any of this **** at the house?" If they said "not at all," and she passed that on then she is not a witness, nor did she commit a crime. That's generally all that would happen.

To get to what the other guy is saying, the FBI would have to show she went to the house, laid her eyes on the stuff, and then decided to lie. That's just now what is known at this point.