(09-12-2022 11:42 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 11:41 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 11:34 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 11:32 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 11:12 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  But, nothing about sending a letter saying "we don't have any classified ****" is criminal.

Done under oath it certainly does put it into play.

Had she simply handed over the redwell and said nothing, then no problem.

The second she hands over a letter to the DOJ, not just a letter but one under oath, that is on its surface a falsehood -- that implicates potentially at least 3 different criminal statutes.

Quote:And, nothing about doing that makes one a witness.

It does so even more than the potential criminal implications. At the very least, given the finding of 100 or so classified documents, her false statement to the opposite absolutely puts her in the witness category. And, he r involvement with the documents in and around MaL absolutely does as well.

Quote:No, the privilege is not blown--nor can it be under these circumstances. You can't go to a lawyer and say "give up your client or we charge you." There is absolutely nothing on the table publicly at this point that even suggests it.

If I commit an overt act that forwards an underlying crime or fraud, the privilege is absolutely at stake in that aspect.

Quote:The crime-fraud exception applies if: the client was in the process of committing or intended to commit a crime or fraudulent act, and. the client communicated with the lawyer with intent to further the crime or fraud, or to cover it up.

Once she delivers that false statement, if false that absolutely is an act that furthers at least two, if not all three, of the crimes listed in the warrant.

Play a stupid game, win a stupid prize.

You're making a lot of assumptions to get there that just aren't in the public record right now.

Have you seen the letter she sent? Were you there when she spoke with her client?

Well that is quite the turn from your original obstinate draw the line in the sand statements above that 'there is zero issue here'.

Seems to me there is enough heat here for Robb to skedaddle to the sidelines and get her own attorney. I wonder why that would be.

Because people with actual power share your excitement and penchant for creating a story better than Walt Disney.

Disney story? C'mon dude. You really doubt that trump had classified government documents in his home that doubles as a hotel? You actually believe the government would be stupid enough to create this whole charade and plant dozens of boxes somehow, especially when trump was watching the search from Manhattan on CCTV?