(09-12-2022 10:35 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 10:28 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 09:42 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 09:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-12-2022 08:39 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Meh, given the stakes and how giddy people are to “get” others getting a lawyer is hardly the actions of a guilty person but rather that of a prudent one.

This is all getting so nasty with each side seeking to abuse a system to hurt others.

Maybe Robb shouldnt have given the DOJ a false sworn statement. Just a thought.

Play a stupid game, win a stupid prize.

I would imagine she took the word of her client to say there wasn’t any there.

Unless the FBI can prove she went to Mar-a-lago, set eyes on the stuff, and then chose to lie she’s got nothing to worry about. But, given how political the whole thing is she’s smart to do that through an attorney of her own.

Charging attorneys for representing their clients isn’t a good look on the part of the justice department.

Its as simple as this:

That thought has been bandied about quite a bit.

It isn't quite that simple. The issue then turns on the timeline.

And corroboration. Something that doesnt seem to exist.

Trump's current attorneys still cannot say that in their filings. Imagine that.

And the current filings still do not even come out and say that Trump has a possessory interest in even the 10k documents that arent classified. He doesnt.

44 U.S.C. Chapter 22

Quote:§ 2202. Ownership of Presidential records

The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

Can someone tell us where any ownership, possession, or control vests with anyone other than The United States? Seems pretty straightforward in that portion of the law. Notwithstanding all the cha cha cha dancing here.