(08-22-2022 08:50 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(08-22-2022 08:17 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-22-2022 08:01 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(08-22-2022 07:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-22-2022 07:34 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  You dont understand classification at all if you are looking for corroboration, Toodles.

Classification involves tons of corroboration, sparkles. Markings like specifics on the folders of precisely what is at subject, date of the change in classification, and from whom the authority to do so.

Somewhat irrelevant, though.

Trump spouts 'standing order!!! Given way back!!'

Yet you cant find *any* corroboration that that happened. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Nothing.

And you cant send *any* corroboration. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Nothing.

And 30-ish Trump advisers, high in the NatSec hierarchy, state that, surprise surprise, *they* had never heard of it. On record. Including two Chiefs of Staff for Trump. One of whom called the idea 'idiotic'.

I guess they dont understand classification either, not nearly as well as the local UMAsUState that blathers it that if it came from Trump's piehole, after the fact, and with zero proof, then the matter is settled.

You, with zero corroboration, against 30-ish senior Trump NatSec staffers and advisers.

You, with zero corroboration, against two Trump Chiefs of Staff.

You, with zero corroboration, against the Trump Chief of Staff who labeled it 'idiotic'.

Which of those two sides of the coin sounds more believable? Absolutely laughable.

Do you not acknowledge there is politically motivated bias here?

'Here' being exactly what?

LOL!!!!! Answered like a tried and true Attorney!!!!!!

Do you not acknowledge there is politically motivated bias against Trump? Hope this provides clarity.

I could have taken 'here' as this board -- which there is definitely politically motivated bias.

Thank you for the clarification, hopefully you will understand that the 'here' was vague.

I think there is a lot of blind, politically motivated bias against Trump in this country. Absolutely.

And to your original question (that didnt specify 'direction of the bias', mind you) -- there is a lot of blind, politically motivated bias for Trump in this country. Absolutely.

One would themselves have to blind not to notice both sides of that coin.