(08-22-2022 03:39 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-22-2022 03:35 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(08-22-2022 03:17 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-22-2022 03:12 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(08-22-2022 01:55 PM)mlb Wrote:  I want it to be released, but at the proper time. I don't want to do it early and cause witness intimidation and such. If they don't charge him with anything then it should definitely be fully released at that time. If he is charged then it will come out as part of the formal charges.

I couldn’t disagree more. They have had enough time to at the very least let us know what charges they are going to bring against Trump. The longer we wait the more ugly this looks. Political Grandstanding. Partisan politics. This is the look most Americans believe as of now right or wrong.

It’s also the reason he is beating everyone in polls for President. Btw, if Lyndon LaRouche can run for President in a jail cell so can Trump.

It’s time to put up or shut up.

I think deciding a legal question on a national poll, and which should be decided on the law and facts, is idiotic.

"They have had enough time to at the very least let us know what charges they are going to bring against Trump."

-- what is the magic determination of time, in your opinion? Nailing some mafiosi took 4-5 years -- yet now you want to put a 'if the investigation isnt concluded in (some rando determination of time)', pull the plug? Does that really sound rational to you?

And yes, there is a legal determination of that time -- they are know as statute of limitations. What time should we magically insert if and only if when the defendant is named Donald J Trump?

I don’t. You are stuck in your normal legalese that are not relevant to an unprecedented raid.

This is not your local run of the mill case.

Actually it is.

It is sole point of it being unprecedented is that it is an ex-President.

It is wholly precedented that Trump is simply a private citizen, who deserves no more, nor any less, of the protections afforded to you or me. Somehow many here think Trump deserves far more.

You are calling for unprecedented alterations to a system when, as it is here, the subject is no more, nor any less, situated than you, me, or any other person. Since you are calling for unprecedented actions like 'They have had enough time', what time should we magically alter it to? Seems to me to be an absolutely fair question to how you have framed your problem. What amount of time should we magically alter this to?

I’ve seen enough of our two tiered judicial system that exceptions are made based solely on who you are. This wouldn’t be any different.