(08-20-2022 04:28 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(08-20-2022 02:40 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-20-2022 12:42 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(08-20-2022 12:21 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-20-2022 11:56 AM)shere khan Wrote:  200 words of bullshite = C
1000 words of bullshite = F

I count 54 letters of non-substantive, crap level ad hom above. Imagine that. I guess that is an A in Gomer land.

I welcome any of the three posters above for *any* substantive dialog. A bridge too far I assume for their wheelhouse comfort zone. Got it.

This doesn’t address the baseline issue that any conversation which doesn’t fall between the parameters of agreement with you and agreement with you lacks substantial dialog, in your opinion. Don’t use the word “any” if you don’t grasp such a simple concept.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Funny I am having dialog with a few people here. Not the zipperheads who think ad homs are the tour de force of communication -- much as you display on an overriding basis.

I’m really just curious if it were Trump’s DOJ/FBI who had raided Obama or even Hillary (who wasn’t even a President), if you would feel as warm and fuzzy with the obscure nature of the raid and “just trust us” reasoning by the FBI?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I actually think he would as long as it stayed within the system that Tanq is clearly comfortable with.

Not sure he actually takes into account on how it looks to the average American.