(08-17-2022 11:32 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:39 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 10:08 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 01:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-17-2022 12:11 AM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:  I’m not naïve enough to believe you liberals deal in facts. If you did, it would be much easier for us to have real conversations.

If you really believed in facts, you just made one mountain of a whopper of a mistake there. You dont have a single clue as to my politics, or how I vote. But look at you proudly kneejerk like a retard on 'you liberals', while at the same time whoofing your overheated brain about 'deal[ing] in facts.'

Amazing, you literally just beat your chest in manly manner about facts and preceded it by simply making something up out of thin air. And is abjectly false. That. Is. Rich.

Maybe that observation might be too much of reach for you. Not my problem.

What a joke, just in that one sentence.

Quote:Let’s get back to real facts.

Lets do that, sparkles. You whiffed on the first paragraph when you proudly proclaimed about 'deal[ing] in facts', mind you.

Quote:The DOJ has done quite a bit of improper things in regards to their numerous “investigations” of a man who was the sitting President at the time

Had you bothered, you might have learned that I note the issues of the FBI with conjunction with Russiagate. But you didnt fing bother, did you? Lolz.

Quote:His people came out publicly saying the FBI improperly confiscated items they shouldn’t have during the raid,

And again, had you bothered to peel your snout off and read, you might have noticed that I noted their taking of the passports. Which are being returned.

Funny, you seemingly dont have a first clue that the vast majority of the items taken, Trump had *zero* right to have in his possession. Nada, zilch, zero.

You also seem to have missed that Trump's attorney wrote the DOJ previously saying Trump did not have *any* such documents in his possession. Pretty much a bald-assed lie based on the numbers of boxes taken back.

Quote:and instead of questioning the DOJ based on historical trends and facts,

Oh goody, now since Trump has been wronged before, he now has the right to flout every bit of the Presidential Records Act? Are you serious about that thin of an excuse? That is my six year old nephew being a bratty crybaby and being a butthead, and trying to excuse it because his sister was a 'nasty poo' to him.

I assume you are over 21 (you see how I dont make **** up out of thin air, there?), yet your excuse comes straight from the mouth of the 6 year old at dinner tonite. Awesome.

Quote: you and your friends just brand “the bad orange man” a liar.

I didnt call him a liar. He carted off the boxes full of National archive material. And then, when pressed on it, his lawyer in his name lied through his teeth about that stuff not being in Mar a Lago.

Hey, its someone else's fault he carted off scores of boxes that he shouldnt have.

Hey, its someone else's fault he blew off subpoenas about it.

Hey, its someone else's fault the attorney, under his name, lied about the presence of the items.

Apparently the justification for that to you is 'the FBI hurty pooed him on Russiagate.' Okey dokey, nephew.

Quote:Then it turns out he was once again correct, and you all continually look like the ignorant, bleating sheep you are.

Do you know how idiotic that looks coming from the dude who thought it a good political point to make 6th grad homophobic ad hom? Seriously? Good grief.

Quote:That enough facts for ya?

Actually, your rant has a more general whining than facts, sparkles. Just saying.

Quote:P.S. Glad you and the Mrs. have a good marriage. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Go back to your banjo picking, Gomer.

You keep bringing up Facts on this topic. Just where are you getting your Facts from ? Would it be the FBI, DOJ, the News. What are your Facts based on ?

Tons of sources --

https://dailycaller.com/2022/08/14/trump...ar-a-lago/

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-la...nyt-2022-8

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/16...o-00052272

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...urned.html

I'd link the WSJ article but its firewalled.

Amongst a very deep pool of others.

None of us on this Board knows what was in them boxes. As far as the News sources
they don't know either. The News is just reporting what someone or others said on what was in the Boxes. I haven't heard yet what were in the Boxes that the FBI took from the Mar-a-Largo Raid. So how can it be a Fact based on your reply ?

Last I noted, I didnt have to be at and experience Three Mile Island to denote an accident there in the 70s. (or was it 80s).

I didnt have to be on Seal Team 6 to be comfortable in stating that Bin Laden is dead.

The funny part -- you all repeat even less sourced stuff as the gospel truth on this board without any hesitation whatsoever. Even you have. Amazing that.

I suggest you go rip on Crimson Phantom for all of his stuff he posts, since, by your viewpoint, since you didnt personally see or talk to the writers, or the underlying sources in those pieces, it there is no reason to believe anything. Sound like a plan there? Do you know how stupid that is?

Yet, you and many others believe them as the gospel truth. But apparently not sourced items that you dont personally like the disclosed information. Lolz.

I have zero hesitation saying that Trump had a buttload of stuff there that he shouldnt have. Both confidential and non-confidential.

I have zero hesitation that the warrant receipt is broadly accurate. Or, I guess a bunch of rampant outlaws decide to falsify the receipts, and risk getting any case that could be filed tossed like the Friday garbage, if that is your alternative. Sounds like a good plan to me, that last one....

The alternative is just another Pizzagate or QAnon craptastic version of a giant, interlaced conspiracy that seems to run rampant in parts.

One question: why bother ask for sources when you know beforehand you are going to stupidly reject the stuff you dont like the content of?

I have to remember that one though. 'You didnt look in the boxes so you cannot believe anything said abut them, sourced or not, about the boxes.' Kind of laughable in retrospect. Doubly so given the mounds of stuff proffered in the same manner that you all believe as gospel truth. Kind of amazing.