(08-16-2022 11:26 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-16-2022 11:08 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-16-2022 11:06 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(08-16-2022 10:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Granted, none of this looks very good, but it never really does with trump as he continually pushes the boundaries of the law and presidential norms, in deference to his own self-interests.

All of this is true, but unlike any other politician, rarely do 'his' self interests directly come at the expense of 'mine'.

I said when he took office, the only way he secures a legacy is to do something 'great' for this nation and were it not for the Democrats and their 'resist' platform, I believe he would have made meaningful changes (for the better for this nation) in our relationships with both friends and foes... where our word meant something and them breaking theirs did as well. It would have meant energy independence and the EXCESS CASH that would have generated to fund improvements to our environmental issues globally. Not that I think he would have sponsored those himself, but that he would have enabled them.

Instead, we've gotten and even more intrusive government... bordering on illegal if not outright illegal... more divisiveness... weaker relations overseas... LESS energy independence...

and quite literally a bill ostensibly to 'reduce inflation' that does not do one damn thing to reduce inflation, but DOES hire 87,000 more people whose sole job it is to take more money from Americans and give it to the government

Coupled with a job description that they are willing to use deadly force.

You're so ******* full of ****. They have posted NO jobs for any new auditors regarding deadly force. The actual story, for those who care about accuracy since we all know "Mr. FBI Agents Sleeping with Suspects" has ZERO integrity.

Quote:Josh Cole, communications director for the IRS, told Newsweek via email that the change was "minor" and on only one page of the IRS website regarding the 1811 special agent job posting.

"The underlying job announcements for special agents, which have been posted on USAjobs.gov since February, did not change," Cole said. "The wording change on one webpage followed continued misstatements and inaccuracies about IRS employees carrying weapons. In reality, only a small fraction of IRS employees—about 2,100 special agents in IRS Criminal Investigation—carry firearms. This is consistent with other federal law enforcement agencies."

https://www.newsweek.com/irs-deletes-req...ce-1733352

Why dont you post what was actually put on the IRS website so we can all see what kind of minor change it was. And I never said it the job description for carrying out the use of deadly force was only for these new agents. I know exactly what it saod and how long it was out there for. And the IRS knew about it, and scrubbed it from their site.

BUT MUH MINOR CHANGE!