(08-15-2022 06:53 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-15-2022 06:28 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-15-2022 06:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-15-2022 06:09 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Just now noticed that the D.o.J. is opposing release of the underlying affidavit. Now there’s a shock.

Tanq, bobdizole, Gamenole (and I’m limiting this to the sane ones), any comment? Are we supposed to continue to wait for Herr Garland to decide when we, the tax-paying public, have a right to know what he is doing with our budgeted dollars?

My bet is no, he has no intention of doing any such thing. And my further bet is that you all will find a way to pretend that this is all just business as usual.

Affidavits should absolutely be unsealed. Ive been saying that from my first post in this thread.

I'm certain there was an 'if' and not a 'should'...

yeah ... #coos-coos3.5X

bump you for you, moonshot...

Well, my friend stink, I am pretty sure that I have said very consistently I would like to see the affidavits -- that is where the real meat is in how this plays out for me.

The opposite (actively squashing the affidavits) is very definitely something I would not like to see.

Be good stink.