(08-11-2022 09:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-11-2022 08:01 AM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(08-11-2022 07:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-10-2022 09:35 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(08-10-2022 07:01 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I suppose you have a credible source and link for this, right? Other than failson eric who wasn't even there?

Wait. You told us for weeks how that little priss pot White House office assistant who wasn’t there “but overheard” stories of big, bad, meanie Trump was a credible source and clearly telling the truths against Trump.

Now, if someone “wasn’t there” you’re okay with questioning their credibility.

Good to see you use some common sense, Tom!

Ummm...dude...I guess you missed the part where the White House office assistant (that's not at all what she was BTW) was under oath given testimony to a House Committee. Additionally, she did not overhear these stories...she testified, under oath, that she was told what happened by the people who witnessed them.

Meanwhile, failson was "testifying" to Fox "news" and their puppets.

Was she there or nah?

Her testimony, under oath, was to what people who were there told her. Why is this so hard for you guys to understand?

You are free to believe that she lied under oath to congress for pretty much zero benefit to her if you want.

Just like Vindman. No personal gain outside of mainstream media fame. Nobody even knew who the hell she was before pulling that stunt.

Both her and Vindman are liars of the same caliber.

Useful idiots for the dem party to mind feed the rest of their useful idiot voters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro