(08-09-2022 09:54 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(08-09-2022 09:46 AM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(08-09-2022 09:42 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(08-09-2022 09:36 AM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(08-09-2022 09:30 AM)Bronco14 Wrote:  You keep repeating the same crap. That won't make it come true.

We'll look at it this way, if the FBI knew exactly what they were looking for, the 15 boxes of documents, and they knew where those 15 boxes were, allegedly secured in a room and Mar-A-Lago, why a 9-hour search. Hence the suspicion of newly produced evidence.

Or politically driven fishing expedition.

And, given the established misuse of our D.o.J. for the Clinton sourced dossier and FISA warrants, which interpretation seems to you to be the most likely?

Oops, never mind, as a committed leftist fairness, consistency and basic logic never enter into the equation. It is team only. You lefty turds have crossed a irreversible line here.

The warrant has to be based on new knowledge of criminal evidence. That's why, while Trump could easily provide a copy of the warrant in his possession he doesn't. Show us the warrant trumpy

Why would he? AG Garland has made him the center of attention and has conferred upon him actual, legitimate victim status - - something he has been craving since the 2020 election. This is a gift to Donald Trump.

If there were a legitimate basis in support of this unannounced search, the onus is on the moving party to show it not upon the target to disprove a negative.

And what an awful precedent that you are justifying here. Are you stupid or evil, TC? It's got to be one or the other.

That isn't how it works. The FBI went to court and obtained a warrant, their burden of proof was already met and the search has been conducted. The burden of proof has now shifted to Trump, if he alleges the search was illegal or unconstitutional he will now have to show a federal judge WHY the warrant should not have been issued in order to have any evidence seized suppressed.