(08-05-2022 07:28 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 07:03 PM)SouthEastAlaska Wrote:  I said this on one of the other billion threads we have but if the BigXII loses $$ it's because OUT was worth 50% of the BigXII value. The 4 schools that were brought in are nice but they don't recoup the lost money. On top of the lost value you now are splitting the pie by 12 mouth's instead of 10.

As far as the PAC is concerned, when you evaluate the PAC's lost value it's only around 25% if I remember correctly. UW on an individual basis is actually the most valuable school in the PAC and that's including USC and UCLA. What drove up their valuation is the LA market, much like the addition of Rutgers, the market drove the add more than the school. So yes the PAC is going to be hurt by the loss of the LA schools but they haven't added extra mouth's that dilute the conferences remaining schools values.

All this being said I don't think there will be a big difference between the two when both have signed their new TV deals.

Im not sure I buy that. USC has value because its USC. USC can still draw viewers even when they arent that good. Im not sure Washington's in that same category. If Washington isnt very good---Im not sure they are drawing any more eyeballs than Cal or Colorado.

I would agree with that. USC and UCLA (and Oregon and Stanford, probably) are viewership magnets even when they're not great. Washington...not so much.

.