(08-06-2022 05:59 PM)esayem Wrote:  

(08-06-2022 02:37 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 09:38 PM)esayem Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 03:36 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-05-2022 03:15 PM)esayem Wrote:  Oh, that’s strange. The Big Ten and Pac 10 held up playoff/championship game progress for years because of their special Granddaddy arrangement. It was sooooo sacred, even until recently when the Rosey wanted to keep their NYD date and tradition and parade and blah blah blah STAB right in the back!

Lol, prove me wrong. Please.

The ACC’s crime is being so slow behind in the expansion process. All the newer schools in the conference were available and discussed in the early 90’s. The Big East was well aware of what they were getting into we they invited Miami basketball (lol) and slapped together a football frankenconference to keep Syracuse and Pitt.

If you can’t recognize the difference, then that’s on you and your blinders.

You're right. Big 10 stabbed Pac 10 in the back. ACC cut off the Big East arms, legs and then gutted them. Big 10 was much worse.

Like I said, the Big East trying to start football was bound for failure from the get.

How many years of SWC tradition did the SEC instigate ending? I suppose you'd be an expert on killing conferences. The floor is yours.

Nobody destroyed a conference like the ACC did except maybe the MWC going after the WAC. VT and Miami made sense, but the rest did not.

You are trying to justify it which is just absurdly hypocritical. We're just calling the ACC fans out on their nonsense.

The Big East is still around, silly bullet. Is the SWC?

The ACC was responsible for getting the Big East back to its roots. This much is true. But to ignore the fact that Miami, Syracuse, Pitt, and BC had wondering eyes for the ACC since the early 90’s is just plain deceptive. Or ignorant. Virginia Tech even longer.

I wish we grabbed VT and Miami and stopped. But the other conferences wouldn’t give us our CCG.

And the SEC just killing off the ACC to help UNC and Co get back to their roots.