But when you read the Kvanaugh concurrence --- at least in my mind you see the way it will follow;

"The NCAA's business model would be flatly illegal in almost any other industry in America, nowhere else in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by not paying their workers a fair market rate."

And the ruling itself really smacks the anti-trust implications of control of the issue by the NCAA. I think what you have here is a 21st century equivalent of NCAA v Oklahoma, where the SCOTUS ruling on the anti-trust reach of the organization in the end had the TV landscape changed forever.

You are correct that *this* narrow ruling isnt the deat knell. But, I can hear the dirges playing in the text of decision and in the concurrence.