Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
CFP Recommendation: 6 conf. champs + 6 at-large
Author Message
bill dazzle Offline
Craft beer and urban living enthusiast
*

Posts: 10,749
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 987
I Root For: Vandy/Memphis/DePaul/UNC
Location: Nashville
Post: #353
RE: CFP Recommendation: 6 conf. champs + 6 at-large
(06-19-2021 05:00 PM)solohawks Wrote:  
(06-19-2021 04:53 PM)Stugray2 Wrote:  The Pac-12 is not going to opt out. Where do you guys dream this up?

There is strong movement to do away with divisions among the Pac-12 ADs. As is they play 9 of 11 schools anyway. Half the CCGs are repeat games as is for the Pac-12, and every CCG is a repeat for the Big 12. Heck most NFL playoff games are repeats. But that doesn't turn off any fans. (Well those with OCD maybe)

What is likely to happen is the Pac-12 and B1G will set it up so that they have the inside track to be in the Rose Bowl semi-final. The SEC (and maybe B12) may do similar with the Sugar Bowl. Those will be fixed on New Years. The Citrus (ESPN home), Fiesta, Cotton (Jerry Jones) and Peach will rotate between New Years and the Semi-Final game. CCG will be up for bid.

The suggestion came from the idea that the PAC would try and play hardball to force P5 auto bids.

The PAC and the Big 10 weren't apart of the working group. Will they sign off on something that doesn't 100% guarantee them special status.

The PAC would have been left out of the playoff if it had been in place this past year. While this past year was special do they want to risk something like that again? Hence their new push for auto bids for P5

The Big 10 has been conspicuously quiet in this new development.

If they want auto bids for P5 as opposed to a merit based 6 best Champions, I could see them threatening to go back to a PAC-Big 10 Rose Bowl once the current agreement expires to try and get what they want


The Pac 12 this year would not have offered one of the top six league champs and, as such, would not have garnered an automatic bid. True. But league champion Oregon could still have been extended an at-large invite. So we can't assume Oregon (or any P5 champion in the future that is not one of the top six ranked DI-A champs) would have not participated in the playoff had been in place this past year.
06-19-2021 05:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: CFP Recommendation - Wedge - 06-10-2021, 12:56 PM
RE: CFP Recommendation: 6 conf. champs + 6 at-large - bill dazzle - 06-19-2021 05:44 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.