(06-10-2021 01:17 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-10-2021 12:59 PM)IWokeUpLikeThis Wrote:  Interestingly, they went with 6+6 instead of the 100% guaranteed certainty of 5+1+6 that Frank always talked about.

That surprises me---but that language is also the only way to avoid anti-trust issues. If I really wanted a guarantee for the P5 champs----I might have gone with the top 7 champs. I cant imagine any P5 champ finishing the season 8th out of 10 champs.

The thing I HATE HATE HATE about this plan is we are right back to placing it all in the hands of the Committee. If this is the plan---fine. BUT---the Committee structure MUST be overahauled. It must be changed to a 10 member group with each FBS conference appointing one member each. If they are not going to correct the ridiculous imbalance in the committee membership, then just get rid of the committee and go back to the old BCS computers/human poll system. That system was far more legitimate that the strictly brand driven Committee currently in place.

Agree. Hate having the committee so involved. They choose the 4 byes as well as choosing all 6 champs and all 6 wildcards. One of the beauties of a 5-1-2 (or 5-1-6) is it cut down the importance of the committee.