(06-11-2021 07:22 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-10-2021 11:52 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Keep looking Elvis,

Long Island has one I believe, and other aggregate studies appear to be right in line.

Not the fish bowl cleaner, mind you, the stuff your Doc would give you, not the local PetCo.

If the evidence is out there (randomized placebo controlled clinical trail) post it. The study posted by the op isn’t it.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fu...2020.22240

“Findings In this randomized clinical trial that included 479 hospitalized adults with respiratory symptoms from COVID-19, the distribution of the day 14 clinical status score (measured using a 7-category ordinal scale) was not significantly different for patients randomized to receive hydroxychloroquine compared with placebo (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02).”

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanet...le/2779044

Findings In this trial that included 685 patients, rates of COVID-19–associated hospitalization in patients treated with hydroxychloroquine or lopinavir-ritonavir were not significantly different compared with those who received placebo.

https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases...treatments

The Solidarity Trial published interim results on 15 October 2020. It found that all 4 treatments evaluated (remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon) had little or no effect on overall mortality, initiation of ventilation and duration of hospital stay in hospitalized patients.

I've posted them before, going back a year or more including this one by Raoult and then others that are meta-analysis of other studies merged into one wide review. One Long Island Doc primarily treating the Hasidic community reported good results back in March or so of last year.

Other than the Trump-hate, why doubt these Docs that are on the front line that are reporting they had good results when given early, in the correct dosages for the right length of time? What do you think they have to gain from lying about it?

Wracking up that new yacht $4.40 at a time?