(06-11-2021 07:54 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(06-11-2021 07:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-11-2021 07:32 AM)VA49er Wrote:  Yes, the sample size is small. However, I have no doubt that even it was larger, and peer reviewed, the left would still discredit it because Trump.

If so, the problem is trump, not the left.

There was no data affirming this drug at the time he made it! Hell it took well over a year to get one small study to even claim it was. Much like his claim that a lab released the virus. Sure, maybe he was right, but at the time he provided no data to affirm that and his own DNI was saying the opposite. Also, he was praising China and Xi at the same time for handling it well!

The guy is just not credible. If you recall, he was privately telling Woodward how dangerous the virus was at the same time he was telling the public it was just a flu that would magically disappear by Easter with warmer weather.

He. Is. Not. Credible.

Well, looks like he was right about Wuhan and everything you say above was said about that situation as well. We'll see....

It was a 50/50 proposition.

I can say it's going to rain tomorrow. If it does, that doesn't make me a meteorologist!

Again, he provided no evidence when he made the claim. His own DNI said the exact opposite at that time. He was praising China and Xi for handling the virus well.