(06-13-2021 08:54 AM)PojoaquePosse Wrote:  

(06-13-2021 02:24 AM)Todor Wrote:  

(06-13-2021 12:39 AM)PojoaquePosse Wrote:  

(06-12-2021 04:25 PM)Todor Wrote:  

(06-12-2021 01:04 PM)Bobcat2013 Wrote:  Ngl, thats kind of a low blow there, it was way colder than that.

As to your main point though I still dont see what has changed about any of these schools to make them more qualified to be FBS than the last time they got passed over. I know people like to use the word potential but then why havent they met this potential after 100+years of existing?

Precisely. And the answer is nothing. Its the first time I have heard of changing conferences before doing the the study to see if the reason for the change makes sense or is feasible. And to explain it, referencing the future study as some kind of "proof" of why the move makes sense.

Its the first time I have heard of changing conferences with a plan of immediately changing conferences. And to explain it, you reference nothing, no announcement from the WAC, no AD emails, nothing, as some kind of "proof" of why the move makes sense.

Ok, so if my prediction is sooo off base, what exactly does the WAC of the future look like to you?

12 or 14 teams that stick together for many years.

I'm very disappointed. I was expecting a ton of documentation, emails, tapped phone recordings, witness statements, and miscellaneous other forms of admissible evidence. You know, the stuff you demand.

But if its just a hunch, or just how you feel, I'm not going to berate you, send a list of requirements to "prove" your feeling is 100% guaranteed to be correct, require evidence, or even to demand to know why you think that.

I'll simply take it in, and consider it. Even if you are not licensed and bonded or a certified message board opinionologist. You don't have to be for me.