The unofficial online home for fans of the University of Cincinnati Bearcats. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

(04-09-2021 07:54 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(04-09-2021 07:26 PM)Bearhawkeye Wrote:  . But JB clearly carried no weight here - they wouldn't even give him the decency of a conversation for crying out loud.

I keep reading this straight from Mars talking point, though Cunningham's statement indicates otherwise. Maybe that's why Mars has been so active. A percentage seem ready to take their story hook, line and sinker.

Bottom line is we don't know everything and while Brannen and his people may believe it's in their interest to burn it down on their way out. I think following a process, not leaking information and trying to play things or behind closed doors and ultimately in court if they have to is the right call for the university.

Well it sounds like Cunningham did eventually talk to (or at least called) Brannen just in time to extremely misleadingly assert it in his release. To wit:

Quote:Mars claimed John Cunningham has refused to talk to Brannen since before the conference tournament (March 11-14) and then "tried to call him for the first time in months mere minutes before sending his agent the notice of termination."

Sound like due process or even simple fairness?