bullet
Legend
Posts: 66,967
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3320
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
|
RE: [NEWS] Supreme Court rules Trump must surrender tax documents to New York prosecutor.
(02-23-2021 09:25 AM)TIGERCITY Wrote: Again, since some here apparently still don't get it. With claims that one can't effect the tax assessment of their properties or that the requested tax information couldn't possibly provide any useful information. This AP article covers what will be likely be requested in the New York prosecutors subpoena (Trump's tax-related information) and how that new information might help in the criminal investigation of El Cheeto head. But of course the Trumper Humpers will call this another biased source or a Witch Hunt or whatever excuse the cultist apply to the shitshow that tumbles out of Trumps clown car next. Like I said time will tell:-)
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-...25b94b1071
Article basically admits its a fishing expedition. And admits there is absolutely nothing in the tax returns except for stuff that would already have been audited by the IRS.
They are also asking for financial statements, which you were too financially illiterate to understand. That will provide more information than the tax returns and a small number of things like related party payments, but not most of the stuff the media is salivating about.
Attorney they interview sounds also like a financial illiterate.
Again, this article, if you understand accounting and taxes, says they have nothing and don't really know what they are looking for.
I'll give you one simple example and then ignore any more ignorant postings by you on this topic. If you want "hush" payments, you list the people and ask for all payments to those people. You ask for list of attorney's payments in that same time frame in case it went through an attorney. Then you see how those things were charged to the books. You start at the bottom with something specific you want to see. You don't start at the top.
Its a flagrant abuse of power by the DA against a political opponent.
|
|
02-23-2021 10:31 AM |
|