(01-31-2022 10:12 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-31-2022 09:40 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-30-2022 06:11 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-30-2022 05:32 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  You do realize that is after the changes I was talking about? TX had to add options to get the law through the courts. Those options didn’t exist in the 2011 law, that’s why it was discriminatory.
In order for the law to not be discriminatory they added those options.

Which is absolutely absurd. A bunch of those alternatives don't really establish that the person attempting to vote is actually the person entitled to vote. For example, anybody could have a birth certificate or utility bill or bank statement without having to be the person named on the document.
But such is the way things work here, where the election system is potentially riddled with fraud. I don't know whether the 2020 election was stolen, and neither do you, because there is no way possible to know.

This is true, but at least that person who votes under that name will be recorded as having voted. There should be some system which reconciles votes across precincts to ensure the same voter did not vote at more than 1 precinct before votes are counted.

But what if the first person to vote using that identity was the impostor? Then the real person comes to vote and is turned away. I know of one case where that happened, and was in fact reported on here. To be clear, in that case it was an honest mistake (father and son with same name) and was quickly and easily resolved.

That was documented quite a bit during the Arizona audit.

People would show up to vote in person only to be told they already voted. They were given a provisional ballot.

I wonder which of the two ballots they actually used.


Keep in mind the feds told the state of Arizona NOT to canvass voters.

Fortunately private citizen Liz Harris built a very large citizen group of over 1,000 canvassers. They held 2 conference calls daily, once in the morning and once in the afternoon.

They fully canvassed two precincts in Maricopa County and parts of others. Last I heard those numbers were correct. I don't know if they were able to complete other precincts in full.

They found that residents were more than willing to participate. They asked each resident:
1. Did you vote in the 2020 election?
2. In what manner did you vote? (e.g. in person, mail in)

They never asked who they voted for.

Their findings were quite alarming, but they followed the trends presented in the official audit. The same audit where the MCBOS kept trying to undermine the findings by Cyber Ninjas.

Liz Harris' citizen group confirmed the findings of the audit related to fraudulent votes.

Steven Crowder had a show dedicated to his crew doing the same type of canvas in New Mexico, granted not nearly on the scale of Harris'. They found the same thing.

It was interesting to watch Crowder's crew standing at an empty lot which dozens of voters listed as their address.