(09-28-2021 11:25 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-28-2021 11:12 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(09-28-2021 10:45 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(09-28-2021 10:33 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(09-28-2021 10:13 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  OK, so you didn't watch the audit hearing from last Friday, 9/24/21. Why am I not surprised?

The audit hearing IS the source.

Seriously, if you haven't watched it, you should. The MSM headlines from the "leaked" document prior to the actual hearing were their attempts to shape their followers perceptions.

If you don't want to watch the hearing then check out the links from the hearing that have already been provided.

Looks like their docs are published here.

https://www.azsenaterepublicans.com/cyber-ninjas-report

I’m sure if that’s the truth you can source where they put it in writing.

Play your game, but I'm not playing. I've been providing links in previous posts, and you just posted links to the documentation. Again, you're answering your own question.

The links are posted. Go back through thread history -- just a few pages since the report came out Friday. They are they.

Ask again if you want, but the answer is the same. I've already provide links.

Oh, and watch the video. It's all right there. I spent a couple of hours watching. I've shared results. If you don't like the posts I've made then take 2 hours out of your life to educate yourself.

But continuing to ask the same question over and over won't change anything.

If you can't source it your're lying.

I know what you think you heard, I want you to show me what they put in writing.

Don't call me a liar. The only reason I blocked RWT is because of his persistent personal attacks. I don't block people and I definitely don't report. But I won't tolerate being called a liar.

I will tell you one more time and one more time ONLY. I have already posted the links. If you didn't see them that's on you.

I will not respond to this question again.

You aren't lying but you can't source it. Sure.

You may not be lying, but you probably didn't hear what you think you did. Which is why I want a link to the source, not just "take my word for it".