(07-16-2021 08:44 AM)Claw Wrote:  

(07-16-2021 08:38 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-16-2021 08:14 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(07-16-2021 08:01 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(07-16-2021 07:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Lastly...

If only that were true....

Excellent, so Sellers must be saying there are perfectly valid reasons for these irregularities. I hope that means that they will address them individually and explain what happened.

That's just it, they're NOT irregularities. The ones they cited so far are just ignorance by the auditors.

There were NOT 74k extra votes! These were in person early votes that the county has ALWAYS counted this way.

What you'll likely see when this is done and the county responds is that they followed years of procedures a certain way, that may not have been 100% best practices or to the letter of the law. So while yes, the Senate needs to have them correct or clean up any shortcomings in the state law, none of that will show any grand fraud.

I think some of this will fall in that category, and that's fine.

Did they address the non-registered voters voting or the massive removal of people that voted from the voting rolls after the election?