(05-07-2021 09:00 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-07-2021 08:29 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2021 03:29 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-06-2021 02:27 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2021 02:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Keep in mind when you are reading responses from CommieTom and PdfElvis, Tom didnt think MI performed adjudication (and he lives there so its gotta be true....but wasnt...he was fooled by a response from Dominion) and PdfElvis believed a report that said a connectivity and security audit turned up no issues in AZ, despite the machines running WIndows7.

AGAIN, I posted that Antrim County did not even use any adjudication software from Dominion...

and AGAIN you are still wrong.

MI doesnt use Dominions DIGITAL adjudication software. That means all adjudication is handled through the nefarious Doninion MANUAL adjudication process, where it goes to a queue for some worker who could be unmonitored in some other room to decide how the person voted, which causes the system to create a new ballot for that vote.

No mope, I'm not wrong. Antrim County did not purchase or use any dominion adjudication software.

You are still wrong because you believed Dominion software's statement, which didnt say what you thought it said.

First, you stated that MI didnt do adjudication. That was just a stupid statement to make. I dont care if you live there or not.

Now you are trying to say MI doesnt use dominion's adjudication software. Thats still wrong. MI doesnt use dominion's package called Digital Adjudication. But MI DOES USE dominions manual adjudication process.

You have zero credibility in anything election related, you thought the paper ballots that dominion prints in GA were taken home by the voter.