The unofficial online home for fans of the Western Michigan University Broncos. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

[/quote]

To be considered "armed" or "aggravated", a perpetrator needs to carry and/or use/brandish any weapon that can cause bodily harm.

It could be chopsticks.

As explained above, “armed” is usually charged as an aggravated, which requires the use of a deadly or dangerous weapon in committing a crime.

There’s little debate whether a functioning firearm qualifies as a deadly or dangerous weapon. But other objects can qualify, as long as they are inherently deadly, or if not, used in a manner that causes or is likely to cause serious physical injury or death. Many debates surround items like stationary objects, canes, animals, parts of the human body, and vehicles.

Firearms or not, these people were most definitely armed. There was most definitely a stand off.

Weird hill to die on.

Brovol could weigh in on this...isn't he a judge?
[/quote]

Brovol is hardly an unbiased judge on Trump. He defends him without fail no matter how disgusting the act. He's Giuliani without the hair dye.