(11-21-2022 01:23 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(11-20-2022 11:36 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(11-20-2022 08:26 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(11-20-2022 04:17 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(11-20-2022 05:22 AM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  Silverfield's position amongst the last ten coaches.

Norvell 38-15 .717
Silverfield 20-15 .571
Fuente 26-23 .520
Stobart 29-36-1 .447
West 49-61 .445
Dempsey 7-12-3 .386
Bailey 12-20-1 .379
Scherer 22-44 .333
Dockery 8-24-1 .258
Porter 3-21 .125

Silverfield's position amongst the last 10 coaches WITHOUT the so-called Norvell leftover team in 2020.

Norvell 38-15 .717
Silverfield 12-11 .522
Fuente 26-23 .520
Stobart 29-36-1 .447
West 49-61 .445
Dempsey 7-12-3 .386
Bailey 12-20-1 .379
Scherer 22-44 .333
Dockery 8-24-1 .258
Porter 3-21 .125

If you are gonna be fair, post the Fuentez record without the Porter leftovers as well. Chop off his first year, Silverfield's first year, West's first year. Norvell and Silverfield are the ONLY 2 coaches to take the helm of a winning program.

No one is trying to quantify Fuentes record.

Come on now. You are smarter than that. You are comparing. But you are comparing apples to oranges.

Nope, the claim is that Silverfield wouldn't be where he is on the list if not for the team left to him by Norvell.

The only variable in the debate is the 2020 season and how it changes Silverfield's position.

You can look at every name on the list and play what-if.

But it has nothing to do with the claim being made regarding Silverfied.