(03-08-2021 02:49 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(03-08-2021 02:46 PM)JRsec Wrote:  You totally misread my post. The dude on the left in a dress with blonde hair appears as a woman but stands like a man. Tranny.

Manspreading, the practice of men sitting with their feet, and consequently their legs, slightly apart, and a wholly separate point, is natural as it helps to maintain potency by alleviating body heat against the testicles. Feminazis have been trying to make that practice some pscyosymbol of male supremacy, which it is not.

That's Rachel 'Richard' Levine. Born a man. Maybe I'm also misunderstanding your post.

Two simple points:

1. I don't know and don't care to know who Rachel "Richard" Levine is, I just say a guy in a dress, whether he's had a sex change or not (Tranny) it's a dude.

2. Feminists have recently been attacking men for "Manspreading" which is the practice of standing, or more particularly sitting, with your feet and legs slightly apart. Feminists say this a man's way of signaling his dominance by making his crotch the focal point.

This is pure horseshit and why I made the second remark. Men's hips are slightly different from those of women because our reproductive organs are external the body for the most part (think testicles, balls, boys, gonads, etc.). When those are pressed to closely to the body the body heat decreases potency so for the survival of the species it is quite natural for men to stand or sit with their feet and legs slightly apart because we were designed that way.

This is why the dude in the dress stands out, other than he's but ugly and looks like he's wearing a blonde wig. He can cut off his equipment but he can't redesign his damned hips.

If you want to have physical evidence that sex changes (outside of hermaphrodites: people born with both sets of genitalia intact and choose) are not natural the physical design of the hips is it. Women's hips are set for pelvic expansion during birth and men's hips are not. Women therefore are more likely to stand feet together and parallel as the flexibility to do so is built in. If a guy tries to stand that way it is uncomfortable, and because he wasn't designed with the flexibility to do so.

So I was agreeing with Good Owls comments and augmenting them with a bit of science.

His response indicated that I was not agreeing at all. He wholly missed my point, as apparently you did as well.