(11-20-2020 03:21 PM)DtownBronco Wrote:  

(11-20-2020 01:47 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-20-2020 01:02 PM)DtownBronco Wrote:  

(11-20-2020 12:46 PM)Claw Wrote:  

(11-20-2020 12:42 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  All you are showing is if they allowed the mail in ballots to be counted ahead of time there would be no argument.

Georgia has physical ballots to back up their numbers. We know that because of the recount and the audit.

Do we have these graphs for Georgia? We shouldn't. If we do this whole line of argument seems suspect.

But if Georgia does NOT show these trends, then we need the Georgia recount and audit procedures applied to the states that do show them.

The top graph is Georgia to illustrate how the algorithm works. The plot isn't time dependent. The X-axis is the total votes cast. The Y-axis is percentage of votes received. The counties are ordered from least votes cast to most votes cast. The red line is Trump, dark blue is Biden, light blue is Jorgensen. Note how Jorgensen’s line is horizontal. The attempt is to show that the results from the smaller counties tend to be an indicator of where the total will end up. Historically, once 20-30% of the votes are tabulated, the statistics will tell you the odds of a candidate winning a particular race are 98% and all the news people will project a winner at that point.

The anomaly is that this data set goes nearly linear as the larger counties are added. As you move along the X-axis, after over one million votes, the curves show almost a one-to-one (0.9815) vote add for Biden and resulting delete for Trump as a part of the whole. Now I get it that larger suburban counties surrounding large cities tend to favor the Dems, but it shouldn't be this clean of trend. The claim is that this was accomplished by a correction factor in the software, hence the need for extra time to tabulate.

The software was either transferring votes from Trump to Biden or dumping votes to 3rd party or non-Trump / non-Biden candidates. Overnight counts were stopped in certain states when it was mathematically impossible to dump enough votes to allow Biden to catch up necessitating the need for physical ballot dumps. The numbers had to made to look "plausible" or close and when it wasn't possible they needed more physical ballots.

Plots below show irregularities of non-repub / non-dem votes increasing over time. States include Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and others. See sideways bell shaped trend.

Georgia executed a hand recount of paper ballots that was fundamentally the same outside of the poorly run counties that lost the cards. They finished wed and certified yesterday.

How did the algorithm change the election by adding votes or miscounting votes, when the paper count matches with the electronic count?

Trump broke the algorithm. He had such a lead that the number of votes that the software calculated for Biden to take the lead exceeded the number of votes normally available in every other election in history. Explains why we are seeing reports of 99.9% voter turnout and in some strange instances over 100%. This is the reason why count stoppages occurred in the night, to manufacture more physical ballots. As GoodOwl pointed out above that is exactly why the ballots counted in the audit matches the machine count in Georgia. The AI identified the target and the ballots were created to meet it. This explains why you have all these reports of "mail-in" ballots not being folded, ballots with only one circle filled in for Biden and no other down ballot, etc. Also explains all the odd reasons we were told why the count had to stop whether it be a water main break or a break for dinner or whatever. Also explains the video of trucks driving up to the TCF center in the middle of the night in Detroit unloading wagons full of boxes.

You started out saying "Trace showing when the software intervened after the algorithm had run long enough and the AI learned what correction factor to apply. That is when the curve goes linear in vote swapping for Biden."

From a conspiracy perspective saying someone manipulated the software to inject or change votes for biden is more plausible, although if that is what had happened the GA recount would have caught it. The reason this is slightly plausible is that it could be executed with a small number of people (1-2). If you are going to commit treason you probably want to keep that close to the vest.

Now you are changing the scenario to "the algorithm figured out how many ballots to print". This scenario is much less plausible, because it takes a ton more people.

You have to develop the ability to print ballots and make them look decent. Same paper, same size, right design. You need more people involved to print and mark 10's of thousands of ballots. This takes a decent amount of people, you are saying it happened in hours when they "stopped counting".

Once they are printed and marked you need to bundle them and send them to the ballot counting center. I need another person willing to commit a felony to get them into the ballot counting center and distribute to the ballot counters.

That is a lot of fraud. It's hard for a bunch of people to keep a secret without someone talking.

And then, after all that work, they forgot to cheat for the down ballot elections and we still have to have runoffs.

I'm not buying it.