(11-20-2020 01:42 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(11-20-2020 01:27 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-19-2020 02:21 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(11-19-2020 02:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(11-19-2020 02:10 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Karl Rove is saying the charges that Rudy and Powell made are extremely serious, but that the legal team has been late, lacking proof, and losing so far in court.

To be fair, I doubt Karl has any clue what they have. Given the death threats, you wont have a witness left if you expose the witness's to the public where the crazies can get involved.

Rove is unfortunately biased as his "guys" lost the primary in 2016 to trump. not sure his butt-hurt has healed enough to trust him. More like Swampity Swamp sez it's over, even though it is far from decided.

That's odd. I have watched Rove multiple times a week on Fox for 4 years, and he has been 100% supportive of Trump the whole time, afaik.

Today, he was reacting to Rudy's presser, nothing more or less. That's all he can react to.

And McCarthy said practically the same thing today, too. Do you guys not trust McCarthy, either? Come on...

If you watched the press conference then you know that Rudy, Sidney, etc. have a lot of evidence. I seriously doubt that either Rove or McCarthy know the full extent of the evidence since they are like us - on the outside looking in. It's not a question of trust or belief. Everyone has an opinion.

Don't understand how MSM and some folks can accept two years of unfounded and debunked accusations with zero evidence leading to a fake impeachment (which should be reserved for actual crimes, not personal dislikes) and then at the same time turn around and claim there is no merit to , for example, 234 publicly filed affidavits by separate individuals who can all face significant jail time if they are found to be lying about what they saw, along with the statistical analyses showing anomaly after anomaly and simply ignore it, because instead of two years it's been, (my goodness!) two Weeks!? I also fail to understand how anyone, any judge or official who is remotely honest or trustworthy would deem to allow "results" which were shown to be fraudulent to stand regardless and irrespective of any 'deadline". Because if that is true, then you are saying that votes don't matter and elections don't matter and our democracy doesn't matter since what is important is arbitrary and honesty is not necessary to fulfill that. That is just nonsense, and no way the US Constitution and all those people died to defend corruption in a major election.

But again, when it came to Russia!Russia!Russia! we "had to pursue it to its end no matter what--why the double-standard here? Let's look into these ballots (not simply re-scan them, as yes, the result is likely to be the same (it actually was different, but Dems say who cares?), but examine each and every ballot in disputed states/areas no matter how long it takes and ask: 1. who is the person voting, 2. are they legally allowed to, 3. did they execute the ballot properly and 4. what anomalies exist on the actual ballots--at least for states fortunate to have paper trails? Most any reasonable person would assume that those are the basic standards, but it seems they are not, and that is a big problem for voters who care about secure and trustworthy elections, which we didn't seem to have (Willfully tossing envelopes so ballots cannot be verified, anyone? Sounds pretty commie dictator shady to me.)

What is the great harm in seeking to get it right? In GA, for example, a state of more than 8 million (and a few million illegals hanging out and about) for only 12,000 some-odd votes to decide the outcome seems worth being sure to protect the rights of those who voted legally, and expose those who did not. If ballots cannot be verified, then throw them out, as any teacher in a classroom school election surely would do, and/or have a re-do where everyone is held to the same standard- ID, legal status and proper form--or allow everyone to stuff as many as they can get in in the allotted time- Trump voters as well--so they can have the EQUAL opportunity to stuff the boxes with carts of extra ballots too, since that is now the apparent rule (Laws be damned, except the precious "deadline!")