(11-06-2020 03:22 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-06-2020 03:03 PM)Bearcat419 Wrote:  

(11-06-2020 02:56 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-06-2020 02:28 PM)Bearcat419 Wrote:  

(11-06-2020 02:21 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Absolutely, positively and necessary...I don't think that is how it is written in the criminal code. Also a cop shooting someone today or 3 months ago has nothing to do with decades and decades ago. Actually the only groups of people who have not faced widespread discrimination in the USA are the post 1965 folks, which are 97% non European.

If you don't think that the current climate and the reaction to police shootings of minorities, mainly black men, has anything to do with the history of this country....

I just... Wow.

Cops kill more whites. It doesn't fit the narrative so the media ignores it. BLM is a Marxist org, fundraiser for ActBlue, that has nothing to do with protecting black folks.
The entire narrative where they got their start was 100% fake news. The hands up don't shoot didn't happen.

You just.. keep moving those goalposts.

Whites are also more likely to be school shooters, serial killers, domestic terrorists, etc. They also make up more of the population.

You can hate the BLM organization if you want to. I don't care. Saying BLM and acknowledging that statement has validity is a completely separate entity.

Saying BLM is a red herring. All lives matter.

*Goal posts shift again*

Saying all lives matter as a retort to Black Lives Matter is a spineless way of saying you don't give lick about black lives.

Why is it that you don't hear anyone yell at a Blue Lives Matter advocate that all lives matter? Surely it isn't to do with the color being discussed...