(10-09-2020 10:26 AM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(10-09-2020 10:25 AM)mlb Wrote:  

(10-09-2020 10:21 AM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(10-09-2020 09:55 AM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(10-09-2020 09:52 AM)macgar32 Wrote:  Just because a player decides it is better for their future to endure a situation doesn't mean the situation didn't happen. I don't think that is a valid argument.

If your mind is mind up based on anonymous sources then I understand why you don't think it's a valid argument. Just saying there is well more than enough uncertainty with how it was presented (all anonymous sources for the recent events) vs the reality (those players that were treated poorly, not only stayed vs other good opportunities but brought additional family members in the environment).

So I don't think your counter is a valid argument either.

Anonymous sources for recent events makes sense wouldn't you say. Would you put your name as a source if there was a possibility of retaliation.

Marshall appears to be a very good coach who develops players. If I am player with Professional aspirations it really aint that big of a deal to ignore a few jokes if that means that I have the best chance of reaching that goal.

(10-09-2020 10:23 AM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(10-09-2020 10:21 AM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(10-09-2020 09:55 AM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  If your mind is mind up based on anonymous sources then I understand why you don't think it's a valid argument. Just saying there is well more than enough uncertainty with how it was presented (all anonymous sources for the recent events) vs the reality (those players that were treated poorly, not only stayed vs other good opportunities but brought additional family members in the environment).

So I don't think your counter is a valid argument either.

Anonymous sources for recent events makes sense wouldn't you say. Would you put you name as a source if there was a possibility of retaliation.

What retaliation can happen to players that are no longer with the program? People in Wichita don't like them? Most of them will never step foot in Wichita again. Why did not a single player than transferred this year step up to have their name attached? Anonymous sources GREATLY diminish the validity of claims. That's not debatable. Especially in situations where retaliation isn't really possible.

For guys who may want to get into coaching, or guys already in coaching, their name being attached could end their career.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

If the claims are true as stated ... then I adamantly disagree. It would have zero effect on their coaching career and instead likely help them get started if they were willing to stand up to what is supposedly a toxic environment.

Lol...

It would be considered violating the sanctity of the locker room. That stuff is supposed to stay in house.

And since they are not named...How do you know none of the sources are currently on the roster or staff?

Think of it as the thin blue line of sports.

Or it could be as simple as they want to move on...Being named brings them back into the situation.