(10-07-2020 01:15 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  

(10-07-2020 12:48 AM)HogDawg Wrote:  

(10-03-2020 10:04 PM)THUNDERStruck73 Wrote:  It makes complete sense for there to be a reshuffle between the SBC and CUSA. That’s why it won’t happen. Exit and entry fees could be waived, but the problem is the tv deals. ESPN could broker it if they wanted to. Maybe they do. Ah, who am I kidding?

I’d love to see App, stAte, ULL, and Troy on the schedule..(App and stAte every year and ULL and Troy in a cross-divisional rotation). I have zero bad feelings toward the Texas schools at all, but it doesn’t make sense these days.

The Belt says they are fine where they are, but as it stands now, CUSA is better this year... so far. We are twins as conferences. One isn’t really above the other in the grand scheme of things. In the end, it’ll be about money. That’s it and that’s all.

I want a conference where fans want to show up because we “hate” them. And when we go there they “hate” us. (Marshall/App plug here). Charlotte, we owe Troy.... stAte is solid... ULL/ LaTech war. How fantastic would that be?

Alas, I just woke up from my dream. Carry on.

I've never understood why so many non-Louisiana people are so interested in pairing LA Tech against ULL or ULM? Neither one of those schools has beaten LA Tech in the last 25 years. That's a long time, people. And neither one of those schools have a great football history.

You can’t beat an opponent that refuses to schedule you.

We've played ULL several times in the last 25 years.

For that matter ULM (but not in the last 20).

The answer to the question of why non-Louisiana people want to pair us with those schools is geography (and a little bit history). Which is fine, but is certainly overstated.