(08-28-2020 04:11 PM)JMURocks Wrote:  

(08-28-2020 03:35 PM)Dukester Wrote:  Alright, I was one who did not have an issue with not playing games this fall and was almost a bit relieved because I was concerned about a serious case.

And obviously I was not following that close, since I just realized today the team had been practicing prior to the positive test earlier in the week.

BUT - if we were already practicing, why did we not schedule 2-4 games? If your taking the risk already, then why not play some games in a non fan environment?

Once again - Dukeman is not allowed to respond to this post.

I know they said getting any deals signed was difficult, but conceptually I agree. Would have liked to see 1-2 games like NDSU is targeting. I’m certain this will not impact spring or playoff eligibility, plus it helps keep the team focused and sharp.

Two possibilities would have been a multi-year deal like NDSU cut with an FCS school (SLC, big south, etc) or possibly a minimal money game against a G5/P5. Obviously no one is going to pay big bucks for an empty stadium game.

Most schools that are playing games are at 20% stadium capacity or less, and no tailgating, so they are working to minimize risks. ‘Bama has said 20%, no tailgating, and ECU is talking about potentially only 500 people in their 50k-ish stadium. They do seem to be going forward with games.

https://www.witn.com/2020/08/23/ecu-inte...-property/

That's certainly possible but pending govt. orders/exceptions it is being speculated that ECU will likely allow 20-30% capacity with obvious safeguards in place.