CliftonAve
Heisman
Posts: 21,935
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1181
I Root For: Jimmy Nippert
Location:
|
RE: Who actually has had competitive success following realignment?
(07-25-2020 03:32 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: (07-25-2020 03:00 PM)THUNDERStruck73 Wrote: First of all, this just shows how weak the Big Least was, and secondly, ALL of those those schools who moved have come out ahead because they are laughing all the way to the bank.
Everyone wants to rag on the Big East but they actually had a pretty good record in BCS Bowl games.
The Big East’s big flaw was that it lacked major tent pole programs that could drive television value.
No disrespect— The three best teams in the Big East on the field from 2005-2012 were WVU, UC and Louisville. The ACC invited the 4th best (Pitt) and the worst performing team of that time period (Syracuse). Louisville got added after Maryland left. And people wonder why the teams that moved have not fared well on the field.
|
|
07-25-2020 06:17 PM |
|