(07-05-2020 08:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  lad seems to be putting the cart before the horse again tonite (logically speaking).

I guess when 200 people tear down a statue that is the de facto feeling of the majority of the 120,000 people in a community. Interesting 'after the fact logic' there.

Do you see the problem in that analysis and that statement, lad?

I guess one can justify *any* act of civil unrest, or for that matter *any* crime on the unfelt needs of the mjority of the community.

I guess a majority of the community simply didnt like portions of their city, and that is why 500 million dollars in bunring/looting damage was incurred. This list could get really fun before too long....

That is the main problem with ex post facto leaps of logical faith.

first they tell us the rioters are less than 1% of the left, and then they tell us they represent the will of the majority of the citizenry.