(06-01-2020 05:48 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-01-2020 05:41 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(06-01-2020 05:17 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-01-2020 05:11 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(06-01-2020 04:53 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I prefer facts, 93. Not suppositions. Should be simple. Apparently not.

By the way 93, you have some facts wrong. Actually numerous.

One cop sat on him. One cop did crowd control. One cop held his leg, and prior to the apparent distress moved away. Another cop restrained Floyd with a single hand on the small of the back.

Chauvin sat in that position for 8 minutes, 30 seconds, not ten minutes.

I suggest you re-edit your historonics about 'four cops sitting on on him for ten minutes.'

Good fing grief. One statement, 3 errors about the cops and one error on the time. Awesome job there.


I am glad you are substituting your expert medical and pathologic knowledge for that of a........ medical professional. And a....... pathologist. Do you play an attorney on TV as well to enamor us with your expert legal opinions as well? Perhaps you should with the angle you are taking above.

In short you say 'I dont give a fk what an expert pathologist says is the cause of death, I will substitute my own opinion.' That really takes the cake there '93. Just awesome.


I will form my opinion based on the medical evidence. Not neceessarily on some douchebag board poster's opinion and his inherent belief without the medical evidence. Sound like plan?

I will respond to the rest later when I have time, but I thought you take great offense to ad homs? I’m confused.

Yes, your inability to state correct basic factual bases does seem to indicate at least some amount of confusion. On that we agree.

It's weird that you took that initial statement re: the pathology report to mean that they didn't think that Floyd was "killed".

Hopefully this will provide you some background:

https://twitter.com/drjudymelinek/status...65634?s=20

Ooh, boy --- proof by twitter feed. *That* is dispositive. Lolz.

By the way I just read the just released medical report.

Floyd died of a heart attack.

But, you got that Twitter feed that proves otherwise. So you must be happy. You are on a roll.

Got it... so the pathologist putting forth her informed opinion doesn't count because she posted it on twitter. Strong take.

So you don't think the heart attack (I haven't read the medical report but I'll take your word for it) was related to the stress placed on the cardiovascular system due the actions of the police officers? So George Floyd wasn't killed... he just died of natural causes? Do you feel this autopsy report exonerates the officers in some way?