(05-14-2020 11:28 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(05-14-2020 11:08 AM)Huckin Fuskie Wrote:  

(05-13-2020 03:47 PM)klake87 Wrote:  Could fall sports be cancelled?

With so many rednecks crying "hoax" and begging to open up too early (it's already started), we'll most likely get our second wave of mass infections sooner than later and it will be obvious in August that there's no way we can have large social gatherings without hospitalizing more people than our health care facilities can process.

SEC will probably vote to sacrifice their trained seals, but I can't see any other conference having football this fall. I doubt we'll have in-person classes.

Lets see if you were starving, if you would not want to get back to work, heartless prick

And still, you won't answer the question.

And who said anything about not wanting to go back to work? Everyone wants to open and go back to school, church, work, etc. However, grownups don't want to kill doctor, nurses and their families so they can go bowling or get their nails done.

You don't get to work just because you want to. Answer the question - do you agree that you and your ilk can do whatever you want, as long as you do not ask for government support -- that you have to self-treat?

We ARE balancing things. We're keeping grocery stores open because people need to buy food. Grocery store workers are dying across the country so you can buy food. They are also having their arms broken or being shot because your buddies don't want to wear masks in PRIVATE businesses. Keeping grocery stores and pharmacies and doctor's offices and car repair places is necessary. However, killing more people because, "The girls at my hair salon need to work and feed their families" doesn't cut it in this situation. Instead of giving bailout/stimulus money to large corporations, we can instead help the girls working in the hair salons.

If I were starving, I wouldn't infect and kill teenage cashiers at grocery stores or mothers working at ICUs so I could go back to work at an Arby's or nail salon.

Who's the heartless, selfish, immoral (and profoundly dimwitted) prick?