The unofficial online home for fans of the University of Cincinnati Bearcats. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

That's my point. It takes a hell of an effort to fabricate data on that large of a scale. Hell, it would be difficult to do with only a hundred patients. And if that's something you're consciously doing, you would have to expect that it will fall under scrutiny eventually. I'm not sure what their issue is, but there was clearly something wrong. I just don't neccesarily think it would be as simple as the nefarious assumptions you'd want to draw.

Also, regarding the clinical trials, I just think that's wrong, at least partially. There were tons of clinical trials testing the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine, some that had nothing to do with this. It's rather disingenuous to say that this completely changed the overall thought regarding the drug, especially when other trials were reaching similar conclusions. Does it have a big impact that may have hindered some research? Sure. It's just not likely that it completely bombed the whole operation based off one big conspiracy. Drug development research simply isn't centralized enough to do that.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk