(03-03-2020 12:37 PM)SEA33HAWK Wrote:  

(03-03-2020 11:24 AM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote:  Also, the lack of a mention of Nathan Davis lately tells me either: 1) Despite prior "reports", perhaps his interest in the job was either overstated or didn't really exist, and/or 2) He would have been out of our price range.

I don't know how that situation stands now, but I talked directly to the person Nathan Davis sent word through that he was interested. So, he was interested in the beginning anyways.

Maybe he was just using our job opening for negotiation purposes. I'm not sure what his original contract was with Bucknell, but he's been there since 2015; maybe either he's nearing the end of his first contract or has "outperformed" his contract extension.